Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34466765›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2021

Cure and Hormonal Control After Prolactinoma Resection: Case Series and Systematic Review.

Marisa C Penn, Tyler Cardinal, Yanchen Zhang, Brittany Abt, Phillip A Bonney, Patricia Lorenzo, Michelle Lin, Jack Rosner, Martin Weiss, Gabriel Zada and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pituitary · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marisa C PennDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4432-3664
Tyler CardinalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Yanchen ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Brittany AbtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Phillip A BonneyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Patricia LorenzoDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Michelle LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-4221
Jack RosnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Martin WeissDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
Gabriel ZadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.
John D CarmichaelDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3194-9249
Keck Hospital of USC · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextSurgical management of prolactinomas is an important treatment for patients intolerant of dopamine agonist therapy. However, predictors of postoperative outcomes remain unclear. OBJECT: While transsphenoidal surgical resection (TSSR) is important second-line therapy in prolactinoma patients, predictors of surgical cure and biochemical remission following TSSR remain sparse.

methodsA retrospective review of prolactinoma patients undergoing TSSR at the USC Pituitary Center from 1995 to 2020 was conducted. Participants were categorized as surgical cure (normalization of serum prolactin without medical treatment), surgical noncure, biochemical control (prolactin normalization with or without adjuvant therapy), and nonbiochemical control. A systematic review of the outcomes of surgically managed prolactinomas was performed.

resultsThe 40 female and 16 male participants had an average age of 35.6 years. Prior treatment included transsphenoidal resection (6, 11%) and dopamine agonist treatment (47, 84%). The 40 macroadenomas and 15 microadenomas exhibited suprasellar extension (24, 43%) and parasellar invasion (20, 36%). Fifteen (27%) were purely intrasellar. Gross total resection was achieved in 25 patients (45%) and subtotal in 26 (46%). Surgical cure was achieved in 25 patients (46%) and biochemical control in 35 (64%). Surgical cure was more likely in smaller, noninvasive tumors, those that were fully resected, and patients with lower preoperative (< 1000 ng/mL) and immediately postoperative (< 7.6 ng/mL) prolactin levels. Ten of 26 patients (38%) undergoing adjuvant therapy achieved biochemical control, which was less likely in men and those with higher preoperative prolactin or invasive tumors.

conclusionSurgical resection of prolactinomas is a safe procedure that, when offered judiciously, can achieve symptom and/or biochemical control in a majority of patients. A variety of predictors may be useful in advising patients on likelihood of postoperative remission.

Indexed as

neurosurgerypituitary adenomapituitary tumorprolactinoma

Identifiers

PMID34466765
PMCPMC8402931
OpenAlexW3157626571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.