Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34466654›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2021

Referral and participation in cardiac rehabilitation of patients following acute coronary syndrome; lessons learned.

Sander F Rodrigo, Henk J Van Exel, Nicole Van Keulen, Loes Van Winden, Saskia L M A Beeres, Martin J Schalij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation among Patients Diagnosed with Cardiovascular Diseases-A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sander F RodrigoBasalt Rehabilitation, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Henk J Van ExelBasalt Rehabilitation, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Nicole Van KeulenDeparment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Loes Van WindenDeparment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Saskia L M A BeeresDeparment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Martin J SchalijDeparment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCardiac rehabilitation (CR) after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has shown to reduce mortality, readmissions, and improve quality of life. CR is recommended by international guidelines but previous studies have shown low participation rates. Systematic CR referral might improve CR participation.

methodsThe present study evaluates CR referral and CR participation of patients hospitalized for ACS in 2017 and treated according to local protocol, which includes systematic CR referral. Participation rate was divided into a group that finished the CR program and drop outs. In addition, factors associated with CR referral and participation rate were evaluated.

resultsA total of 469 patients eligible for CR were included in the study, of which 377 (80%) were referred for CR and 353 (75%) participated in CR. Ninety percent of participants completed the CR program. Factors independently associated with CR referral included age (50-60 year vs. > 70 year: odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98-11.2), diagnosis (ST-elevation myocardial infarction vs. unstable angina: OR 17.7, CI 7.59-41.7), previous cardiovascular disease (OR 0.4, CI 0.19-0.73) and left ventricular dysfunction vs. normal function (OR 2.2, CI 1.11-4.52). A larger distance to the CR center was associated with lower CR participation (<5km vs. > 20 km: OR 3.1, CI 1.20-7.72).

conclusionsSystematic CR referral in ACS patients results in high CR referral (80%) and participation (75%) rates. CR adherence might be further improved by increasing CR referral, especially in older patients and patients with NSTEMI or unstable angina.

Indexed as

ACS, Acute coronary syndromeCardiac rehabilitationCI, Confidence intervalCR, Cardiac rehabilitationCVA, Cerebrovascular accidentDBC, Diagnosis treatment combination (Diagnose behandel combinatie)EPD, Electronic patient dossierLV, Left ventricularNSTEMI, Non ST-elevation myocardial infarctionOR, Odds ratioPatient participationReferralSecondary preventionSES, Socio-economic statusSTEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarctionTIA, Transient ischemic attack

Identifiers

PMID34466654
PMCPMC8382985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.