Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34466618›Full record

ReviewGalen medical journal2020

Prognostic Impact of Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio in Clinical Outcome of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Masoud Nouri-Vaskeh, Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, Fariba Pashazadeh, Saber Azami-Aghdash, Hadi Alizadeh, Parnia Pouya, Monireh Halimi, Golamreza Jadideslam, Mohammad Zarei

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Galen medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Masoud Nouri-VaskehImmunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-AttariAging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Fariba PashazadehIranian EBM Centre: A Joanna Briggs Institute Affiliated Group.
Saber Azami-AghdashTabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Hadi AlizadehFaculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Parnia PouyaFaculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Monireh HalimiDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Golamreza JadideslamDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz university of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad ZareiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IRUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) is a surrogate marker of systemic inflammation which is shown to be related to the patient's survival in multiple malignancies. An important implication of this marker potentially is neoplasms in which there is no correlation between prognosis and histopathological staging and also has no reliable chemical markers associated with prognosis. Herein, this meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prognostic role of LMR in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn the current systemic review and meta-analysis, we conducted a systemic search of databases and indexing sources, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus, and ProQuest up to May 2019 toinclude studies on the prognostic significance of LMR on patients with HCC. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) values were extracted from the studies and analyzed. The pooled hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval was explored to identify the prognostic value of the LMR in the survival of the patients with HCC.

resultsA total of 12 studies with a total sample size of 3750 cases were included. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies; therefore, subgroup analysis was also performed. Overall analysis regarding OS showed an insignificant relationship between LMR and patient's prognosis, dividing to subgroups based on LMR cut-offs did not yield any significant result, subgroup analysis for RFS founded statistically significant results and LMR was significantly related to DFS.

conclusionHigh LMR was associated with increased DFS and RFS, in return this association was not observed for OS.

Indexed as

Disease-Free SurvivalHepatocellular CarcinomaLiver NeoplasmLymphocyte to Monocyte RatioSurvival

Identifiers

PMID34466618
PMCPMC8344106
OpenAlexW3115850774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.