ArticleGalen medical journal2020
The Role of
Article in Galen medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serological and virological characterization of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients with or without Helicobacter pylori co-infection at the university of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Potential Efficacy of Propolis in TreatingNutrients · 2025Review
- Clinical and biochemical characterization of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients with or withoutFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Adjuvants forVirulence · 2024Review
- Extracellular vesicle-mediated regulation of macrophage polarization in bacterial infections.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Evaluation ofIranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegarding the important role of proinflammatory outer membrane protein (OipA) in the pathogenesis of MATERIALS AND
methodsThe recombinant protein used in the present study corresponding to the
resultsThe amounts of IL-4 and IFN-γ were significantly increased. The optimum concentration of OipA for the secretion of IL-4 was 5 μg/ml (P<0.0001). At higher concentrations, the amount of IL-4 diminished until suppression at 40 μg/mL. The optimum concentration of propolis, resulting in the most significant increased secretion of both IL-4 and IFN-γ was 40 μg/mL (P=0.0001 and P=0.0004).
conclusionWe found that an OipA concentration of 10 μg/mL was more effective for IFN-γ production; however, it was not effective for the high production of IL-4. Therefore, it is postulated that the OipA could mainly induce a Th1 response through the production of IFN-γ. We also observed propolis's capability to induce IFN-γ production; however, the effective concentration for this was the same as for IL-4. Therefore, as an adjuvant, proper concentration of propolis is required for OipA to give the optimum response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.