Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34466160›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2021

Reasoned opinion on the joint review of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for fosetyl, disodium phosphonate and potassium phosphonates according to Articles 12 and 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Giulia Bellisai, Giovanni Bernasconi, Alba Brancato, Luis Carrasco Cabrera, Lucien Ferreira, German Giner, Luna Greco, Samira Jarrah, Aija Kazocina and 12 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The 2024 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The 2021 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  8. Scientific statement on the maximum residue levels for potassium phosphonates.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  9. The 2020 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Giulia Bellisai
Giovanni Bernasconi
Alba Brancato
Luis Carrasco Cabrera
Lucien Ferreira
German Giner
Luna Greco
Samira Jarrah
Aija Kazocina
Renata Leuschner
Jose Oriol Magrans
Ileana Miron
Stefanie Nave
Ragnor Pedersen
Hermine Reich
Silvia Ruocco
Miguel Santos
Alessia Pia Scarlato
Anne Theobald
Benedicte Vagenende
Alessia Verani

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EFSA received from the European Commission a mandate to provide its reasoned opinion on the joint review of maximum residue levels (MRLs) for fosetyl and phosphonates in or on food and feed according to Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, EFSA has reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) currently established at European level for the pesticide active substances potassium and disodium phosphonates. As fosetyl, potassium phosphonates and disodium phosphonates degrade to phosphonic acid, it was considered appropriate to jointly review the residues of these three active substances. To assess the occurrence of fosetyl, potassium phosphonates and disodium phosphonate residues in plants, processed commodities, rotational crops and livestock, EFSA considered the conclusions derived in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the MRLs established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission as well as the European authorisations reported by Member States (including the supporting residues data) and the monitoring data from official control. Based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Although no apparent risk to consumers was identified, some information required by the regulatory framework was missing. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only and some MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers.

Indexed as

consumer risk assessmentdisodium phosphonatefosetylfungicideMRL reviewpotassium phosphonatesRegulation (EC) No 396/2005

Identifiers

PMID34466160
PMCPMC8385688
OpenAlexW3195670566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.