ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2021
University health sciences students rating for a blended learning course framework.
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOnline teaching methods are used to identify the effectiveness of blended learning. The present study aimed to evaluate the attitudes and satisfaction of health sciences students in Saudi Arabia towards blended learning.
methodsThe study used mixed research approach by recruiting students from academic year 2017-2019. Phenomenography technique were used to examine the qualitative data for research.
resultsThe instrument was a valid measurement outcome for blended learning courses. Students generally preferred team-based learning rather than face-to-face lectures, which serves as a collaborative learning pedagogy. A high positive attitude and motivation was revealed among the students with respect to the blended model in teaching the research course.
conclusionThe attitude and satisfaction of students seemed to play a vital role in teaching and learning outcomes. Moreover, it was found that the e-learning tools provided flexible learning environment to the students, regardless of location and time zone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.