Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34465982›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2021

What Matters to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis When Facing Medical or Non-Medical Treatment Decisions?

Lisa Emily Cornelissen, Elise J van der Mark, Patricia Pennings, Bertha Maat, Theo Foekens, Gerardine Willemsen-de Mey, Helene R Voogdt-Pruis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa Emily CornelissenNational Association ReumaZorg Nederland, Nijmegen, 6500 AB, Netherlands.
Elise J van der MarkVU Amsterdam, Athena Institute, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands.
Patricia PenningsNational Association ReumaZorg Nederland, Nijmegen, 6500 AB, Netherlands.
Bertha MaatNational Association ReumaZorg Nederland, Nijmegen, 6500 AB, Netherlands.
Theo FoekensNational Association ReumaZorg Nederland, Nijmegen, 6500 AB, Netherlands.
Gerardine Willemsen-de MeyNational Association ReumaZorg Nederland, Nijmegen, 6500 AB, Netherlands.
Helene R Voogdt-PruisUniversity Medical Centre Utrecht, Julius Center Global Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7801-3897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn rheumatoid arthritis care, patients and healthcare professionals regularly face health treatment decisions. Sorting out what matters to a patient as being relevant to a specific decision is therefore essential.

methodsAn explorative mixed-methods study was performed to investigate patients' values for health treatment decisions and their importance in order to develop a future decision aid on value clarification. Ten semi-structured interviews with patient partners were conducted followed by an online survey among the broader population of patients. Qualitative content analysis was performed. Data from the online survey were analysed descriptively and quantitatively.

resultsAccording to patients, 17 important health treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis care can occur. The most commonly reported decisions concerned the use of medication. A variety of values may guide patients' health treatment decisions. We found 66 values among four domains of values - decisional, situational, external and global. Among decisional values, reported main values were a) effectiveness of treatment on inflammation, functioning, pain and fatigue; b) avoiding negative side-effects; and c) keeping in good physical condition. In addition, situational values turned out to be a) staying independent; b) being able to meet people; and c) leading as normal a life as possible. Furthermore, patients prefer healthcare professionals who a) take comorbidity into account, b) have enough time, and c) take the patient seriously in their choices - the external values. Finally, as global values were expressed a) autonomy; b) self-image, and c) intimacy. All values are specified by underlying quotes, for example, the value effectiveness on inflammation; "That inflammation has got to go, because you've then got the risk that you'll develop all kinds of things in the course of time".

conclusionA variety of values may guide patients' health treatment decisions within rheumatoid arthritis care. Patients and professionals should discuss patients' values continuously.

Indexed as

patient-centered carepreference elicitationshared decision makingvalue clarification

Identifiers

PMID34465982
PMCPMC8403072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.