Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34465946›Full record

ArticleReviews in fish biology and fisheries2022

Empowering her guardians to nurture our Ocean's future.

Mibu Fischer, Kimberley Maxwell, Nuunoq, Halfdan Pedersen, Dean Greeno, Nang Jingwas, Jamie Graham Blair, Sutej Hugu, Tero Mustonen, Eero Murtomäki and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in fish biology and fisheries, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Managed retreat and planned retreat: a systematic literature review.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Indigenous Knowledge as a sole data source in habitat selection functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The super wicked problem of ocean health: a socio-ecological and behavioural perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Ocean resource use: building the coastal blue economy.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2022
    Article
  13. Poleward bound: adapting to climate-driven species redistribution.Reviews in fish biology and fisheries · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mibu FischerCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Brisbane, QLD Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1216-3451
Kimberley MaxwellTe Kōtahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, Tauranga, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6360-0252
NuunoqThe Pisuna Project, Attu, Greenland.
Halfdan PedersenPikkoritta Consult, Aasiaat, Greenland.
Dean GreenoCentre for Marine Socioecology, Hobart, TAS Australia.
Nang JingwasHereditary Chief, Haida Nation, Canada.
Jamie Graham BlairInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS Australia.
Sutej HuguIndigenous Taiwan Self-Determination Alliance (ITW-SDA), Namasia, Taiwan.
Tero MustonenSnowchange Cooperative, Selkie, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2023-9065
Eero MurtomäkiSnowchange Cooperative, Selkie, Finland.
Kaisu MustonenSnowchange Cooperative, Selkie, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coastal Indigenous and Traditional communities are starting to see changes to their lives from climate change, whether this is from species range changes or displacement from land changes. For many of these communities, the ability to adequately adapt to these changes is limited by the governance structures they are required to live within, which differ from their customary practices and culture. In November 2019, a group of Indigenous and Traditional Peoples, attended the Future Seas 2030 workshop and discussed the consequences of climate change, the biggest barriers for their communities, and barriers for using traditional knowledge in order to contribute towards a more sustainable future that in the end will benefit all of earth's people. The aim of this workshop was to highlight and give a voice to the various backgrounds and real-life situations impacting on some of the world's Indigenous and Traditional communities whose connection with the oceans and coasts have been disrupted. This paper presents these issues of oppression, colonisation, language and agency, making it difficult for these groups to contribute to the current management of oceans and coasts, and asks scientists and practitioners in this space to be allies and enable the needed shift to earth's guardians taking a leading role in nurturing her for our future.

Indexed as

Climate changeColonisationFirst NationsIndigenousTraditional ecological knowledgeTraditional people

Identifiers

PMID34465946
PMCPMC8396138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.