ArticleScientific reports2021
Additional use of anti-rotation U-blade (RC) decreases lag screw sliding and limb length inequality in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gamma 3 vs Gamma 3 RC in Unstable Extracapsular Hip Fractures: A Prospective Randomized study.International orthopaedics · 2026Trial
- [Short-term effectiveness of Gamma 3 U-Blade system for osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Treatment outcomes of concomitant ipsilateral neck and trochanteric fractures using Gamma3 nails with U-blade lag screws.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2024Article
- U-blade gamma 3 vs. gamma 3 nails for intertrochanteric hip fracture: Meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the cut-out rate and sliding distance associated with limb length inequality between operations using a standard non-sliding lag screw versus those using a non-sliding lag screw with U-blade (RC) in the Gamma3 nail. This is a retrospective review of two case series involving different lag screws for the Gamma3 nail. Propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust the confounding factors. A comparative analysis of 304 patients who treated with Gamma3 nail with either a standard non-sliding lag screw or a U-Blade (RC) lag screw was performed. Between 2014 and 2018, 152 patients were treated with U-blade (RC) lag screws, and these patients were matched with those treated with standard lag screws. There was no significant difference in cut-out rate between groups. However, additional use of anti-rotation U-blade (RC) could significantly decrease lag screw sliding, with the group treated with U-Blade (RC) lag screws exhibiting shorter sliding, especially in AO/OTA31 A2 and A3 fractures. Also, in A2 and A3 fractures, the mean lag screw sliding distance was greater than that seen in A1 fractures in both groups. These findings can help trauma surgeons choose the proper implant to reduce leg length inequality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.