Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34465774›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2021

The use of shared haplotype length information for pedigree reconstruction in asexually propagated outbreeding crops, demonstrated for apple and sweet cherry.

Nicholas P Howard, Cameron Peace, Kevin A T Silverstein, Ana Poets, James J Luby, Stijn Vanderzande, Charles-Eric Durel, Hélène Muranty, Caroline Denancé, Eric van de Weg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. QTL mapping and genomic prediction of resistance to apple blotch (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PidTools: Algorithm and web tools for crop pedigree identification analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. DNA profiling with the 20K apple SNP array revealsFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicholas P HowardInstitut für Biologie und Umweltwissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany. howar622@umn.edu.
Cameron PeaceDepartment of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, WA, USA. cpeace@wsu.edu.
Kevin A T SilversteinMinnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ana PoetsMinnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
James J LubyDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Stijn VanderzandeDepartment of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, WA, USA.
Charles-Eric DurelUniversité d'Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR 4207, QuaSaV, Beaucouzé, France.
Hélène MurantyUniversité d'Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR 4207, QuaSaV, Beaucouzé, France.
Caroline DenancéUniversité d'Angers, Institut Agro, INRAE, IRHS, SFR 4207, QuaSaV, Beaucouzé, France.
Eric van de WegPlant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9443-5974

Funding

EC | EC Seventh Framework Programm | FP7 Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology (FP7-KBBE - Specific Programme "Cooperation": Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Biotechnology) 265582Niedersächsische Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur (Lower Saxony Ministry of Science and Culture) EGONUnited States Department of Agriculture | Agricultural Research Service (USDA Agricultural Research Service) 1014919United States Department of Agriculture | Agricultural Research Service (USDA Agricultural Research Service) 2014-51181-22378University of Minnesota (UM) MIN-21-040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pedigree information is of fundamental importance in breeding programs and related genetics efforts. However, many individuals have unknown pedigrees. While methods to identify and confirm direct parent-offspring relationships are routine, those for other types of close relationships have yet to be effectively and widely implemented with plants, due to complications such as asexual propagation and extensive inbreeding. The objective of this study was to develop and demonstrate methods that support complex pedigree reconstruction via the total length of identical by state haplotypes (referred to in this study as "summed potential lengths of shared haplotypes", SPLoSH). A custom Python script, HapShared, was developed to generate SPLoSH data in apple and sweet cherry. HapShared was used to establish empirical distributions of SPLoSH data for known relationships in these crops. These distributions were then used to estimate previously unknown relationships. Case studies in each crop demonstrated various pedigree reconstruction scenarios using SPLoSH data. For cherry, a full-sib relationship was deduced for 'Emperor Francis, and 'Schmidt', a half-sib relationship for 'Van' and 'Windsor', and the paternal grandparents of 'Stella' were confirmed. For apple, 29 cultivars were found to share an unknown parent, the pedigree of the unknown parent of 'Cox's Pomona' was reconstructed, and 'Fameuse' was deduced to be a likely grandparent of 'McIntosh'. Key genetic resources that enabled this empirical study were large genome-wide SNP array datasets, integrated genetic maps, and previously identified pedigree relationships. Crops with similar resources are also expected to benefit from using HapShared for empowering pedigree reconstruction.

Identifiers

PMID34465774
PMCPMC8408172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.