ArticleJournal of physical activity & health2021
A New Decade of Healthy People: Considerations for Comparing Youth Physical Activity Across 2 Surveillance Systems.
Article in Journal of physical activity & health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationships of Social Support, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy With Physical Activity Among Adolescents Aged 10-14: A Cross-Sectional Study.Research quarterly for exercise and sport · 2026Trial
- Device-Based Physical Activity Surveillance in Asian American Children and Adolescents: Participation and Activity Patterns in NHANES 2011-2014.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Changes in US Youth With Neighborhood Built Environment Supports for Physical Activity by Sociodemographic Characteristics, 2016-2017 to 2022-2023.Journal of physical activity & health · 2026Article
- Time Playing Outdoors Among Children Aged 3-5 Years: National Survey of Children's Health, 2021.American journal of preventive medicine · 2024Article
- Prevalence of vision zero action plans or strategies: USA, 2021.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthy People 2030 includes objectives to increase meeting the aerobic physical activity guideline for ages 6-13 years (of ages 6-17 y, monitored by National Survey of Children's Health [NSCH]) and grades 9 to 12 (mostly aged 14-18+ y, monitored by Youth Risk Behavior Survey [YRBS]). This study compares methodologies, prevalence, and patterns of meeting the guideline, particularly for overlapping ages 14-17 years.
methodsNationally representative surveys, 2016-2017 NSCH (adult proxy report, 6-17 y) and 2015 and 2017 YRBS (self-report, grades 9-12), assess meeting the guideline of ≥60 minutes of daily moderate to vigorous physical activity. Prevalence and odds ratios were estimated by age group and demographics.
resultsFor youth aged 14-17 years, 17.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.1-18.7; NSCH) and 27.0% (95% CI, 25.6-28.5; YRBS) met the guideline. 25.9% (95% CI, 24.8-27.2) aged 6-13 years (NSCH) and 26.6% (95% CI, 25.3-28.0) in grades 9 to 12 (YRBS) met the guideline. Across surveys, fewer females (P < .001) and Asian youth (P < .001 except among NSCH 14-17 y) met the guideline.
conclusionsNeither methodology nor estimates for meeting the aerobic guideline are similar across surveys, so age continuity between juxtaposed estimates should not be assumed by magnitude nor age for separate Healthy People 2030 youth physical activity objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.