Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34465344›Full record

Trial reportReproductive health2021

Effects of sanitary pad distribution and reproductive health education on upper primary school attendance and reproductive health knowledge and attitudes in Kenya: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Karen Austrian, Beth Kangwana, Eunice Muthengi, Erica Soler-Hampejsek

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen AustrianPoverty, Gender and Youth Program, Population Council-Kenya, PO Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya. kaustrian@popcouncil.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-7908
Beth KangwanaPoverty, Gender and Youth Program, Population Council-Kenya, PO Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.
Eunice MuthengiPoverty, Gender and Youth Program, Population Council-Kenya, PO Box 17643-00500, Nairobi, Kenya.
Erica Soler-Hampejsek, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1140962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent girls' risk of school dropout and reproductive health (RH) challenges may be exacerbated by girls' attitudes toward their bodies and inability to manage their menstruation. We assessed effects of sanitary pad distribution and RH education on girls in primary grade 7 in Kilifi, Kenya.

methodsA cluster randomized controlled trial design was used. Eligible clusters were all non-boarding schools in three sub-counties in Kilifi County that had a minimum of 25 girls enrolled in primary grade 7. 140 primary schools, 35 per arm, were randomly assigned to one of four study arms: (1) control; (2) sanitary pad distribution; (3) RH education; or (4) both sanitary pad distribution and RH education. Outcomes were school attendance, school engagement, RH knowledge and attitudes, gender norms, and self-efficacy. For outcomes measured both at baseline and endline, difference-in-differences (DID) models were estimated and for outcomes without baseline data available, analysis of covariance models were used.

resultsThe study enrolled 3489 randomly selected girls in primary grade 7, with a mean age of 14.4 (SD 1.5). Girls in arms 2 and 4 received on average 17.6 out of 20 packets of sanitary pads and girls in arms 3 and 4 participated on average in 21 out of 25 RH sessions. Ninety-four percent of the baseline sample was interviewed at the end of the intervention with no differential attrition by arm. There was no evidence of an effect on primary school attendance on arm 2 (coefficient [coef] 0.37, 95% CI - 0.73, 1.46), arm 3 (coef 0.14, 95% CI - 0.99, 1.26) or arm 4 (coef 0.58, 95% CI - .37, 1.52). There was increased positive RH attitudes for girls in arm 3 (DID coef. 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.86) and arm 4 (DID coef. 0.85, 95% CI 0.64, - 1.07). There was also an increase in RH knowledge, gender norms and self-efficacy in arms 3 and 4.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that neither sanitary pad distribution nor RH education, on their own or together, were sufficient to improve primary school attendance. However, as the RH education intervention improved RH outcomes, the evidence suggests that sanitary pad distribution and RH education can be positioned in broader RH programming for girls.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN10894523. Registered 22 August 2017-Retrospectively registered, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN10894523.

Indexed as

Menstrual Hygiene ProductsReproductive HealthAdolescentFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKenyaMenstruationSchoolsAdolescent girlsKenyaMenstrual healthRandomized controlled trialSexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID34465344
PMCPMC8406733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.