Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34465319›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

The COVID-19 Pandemic Mental Health Questionnaire (CoPaQ): psychometric evaluation and compliance with countermeasures in psychiatric inpatients and non-clinical individuals.

Stephanie V Rek, Markus Bühner, Matthias A Reinhard, Daniel Freeman, Daniel Keeser, Kristina Adorjan, Peter Falkai, Frank Padberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie V RekDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstraße 7, Munich, Germany. s.rek@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Markus BühnerDepartment of Psychology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Matthias A ReinhardDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstraße 7, Munich, Germany.
Daniel FreemanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daniel KeeserDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstraße 7, Munich, Germany.
Kristina AdorjanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstraße 7, Munich, Germany.
Peter FalkaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstraße 7, Munich, Germany.
Frank PadbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstraße 7, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has greatly impacted people's lives across a broad spectrum of psychosocial domains. We report the development and psychometric evaluation of the self-report COVID-19 Pandemic Mental Health Questionnaire (CoPaQ), which assesses COVID-19 contamination anxiety, countermeasure necessity and compliance, mental health impact, stressor impact, social media usage, interpersonal conflicts, paranoid ideations, institutional & political trust, conspiracy beliefs, and social cohesion. Further, we illustrate the questionnaire's utility in an applied example investigating if higher SARS-Cov-2 infection rates in psychiatric patients could be explained by reduced compliance with preventive countermeasures.

methodsA group of 511 non-clinical individuals completed an initial pool of 111 CoPaQ items (Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/3evn9/ ) and additional scales measuring psychological distress, well-being, and paranoia to assess construct validity and lifetime mental health diagnosis for criterion validity. Factor structure was determined by exploratory factor analyses and validated by conducting confirmatory factor analysis in the accompanying longitudinal sample (n = 318) and an independent psychiatric inpatient sample primarily admitted for major depressive-, substance abuse-, personality-, and anxiety disorders (n = 113). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega. For the applied research example, Welch t-tests and correlational analyses were conducted.

resultsTwelve out of 16 extracted subscales were retained in the final questionnaire version, which provided preliminary evidence for adequate psychometric properties in terms of factor structure, internal consistency, and construct and criterion validity. Our applied research example showed that patients exhibited greater support for COVID-19 countermeasures than non-clinical individuals. However, this requires replication in future studies.

conclusionsWe demonstrate that the CoPaQ is a comprehensive and valid measure of the psychosocial impact of the pandemic and could allow to a degree to disentangle the complex psychosocial phenomena of the pandemic as exemplified by our applied analyses.

Indexed as

COVID-19Major Depressive DisorderHumansInpatientsMental HealthPandemicsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCoronavirusFactor analysisPreventive countermeasuresPsychosocial impactQuestionnaire validation

Identifiers

PMID34465319
PMCPMC8406012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.