Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34465243›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Coupling spectral and resource-use complementarity in experimental grassland and forest communities.

Anna K Schweiger, Jeannine Cavender-Bares, Shan Kothari, Philip A Townsend, Michael D Madritch, Jake J Grossman, Hamed Gholizadeh, Ran Wang, John A Gamon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna K SchweigerDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5567-4200
Jeannine Cavender-BaresDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3375-9630
Shan KothariInstitut de recherche en biologie végétale and département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9445-5548
Philip A TownsendDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7003-8774
Michael D MadritchDepartment of Biology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA.
Jake J GrossmanBiology Department, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6468-8551
Hamed GholizadehCenter for Applications of Remote Sensing, Department of Geography, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4770-7893
Ran WangCenter for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies (CALMIT), School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3810-9103
John A GamonCenter for Advanced Land Management Information Technologies (CALMIT), School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8269-7723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reflectance spectra provide integrative measures of plant phenotypes by capturing chemical, morphological, anatomical and architectural trait information. Here, we investigate the linkages between plant spectral variation, and spectral and resource-use complementarity that contribute to ecosystem productivity. In both a forest and prairie grassland diversity experiment, we delineated

Indexed as

EcosystemGrasslandBiodiversityForestsHumansPlantsecosystem productivityindividual plant growthn-dimensional hypervolume conceptoptical typesspectral typesspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID34465243
PMCPMC8437019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.