Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34464915›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2022

Peer selection and influence for marijuana use in a complete network of first-year college students.

Nancy P Barnett, Graham T DiGuiseppi, Eric A Tesdahl, Matthew K Meisel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy P BarnettCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies and Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Box G-S121-5, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States. Electronic address: Nancy_barnett@brown.edu.
Graham T DiGuiseppiDepartment of Children, Youth, and Families Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, 669 West 34th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States.
Eric A TesdahlMedical Department, SpecialtyCare Inc., 5203 Elkins Ave, Nashville, TN 37209, United States.
Matthew K MeiselCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies and Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Box G-S121-5, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States.
Brown University · USCARE USA · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Reducing Hazardous Alcohol Use in Social Networks using Targeted InterventionR01AA023522 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BARNETT, NANCY P · 2015 to 2020
$3.7M
Developmental Transitions, Social Networks, and Alcohol Use Among Non Four-Year College Emerging AdultsK01AA025994 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MEISEL, MATTHEW K · 2017 to 2021
$902k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA025994NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarijuana is the most frequently used illicit drug among college students, and there is a need to understand the social processes that contribute to young adults' marijuana use. Substance use behaviors tend to be more similar (homophilous) among individuals with social ties to one another. However, little is known about whether marijuana use homophily within young adult relationships is due to social selection (seeking out ties with similar marijuana use to one's own) or social influence (adopting similar marijuana use behaviors as one's ties), or both.

methodsStudents (N = 1,489; 54.6% female; M

resultsParticipants were more likely to select peers with similar past 30-day marijuana use as themselves. Concurrently, students' past 30-day marijuana use became more similar to their peers' use over time. DISCUSSION: Evidence for selection and influence effects were highly significant after controlling for network structure and other covariates indicating these processes may work in tandem to increase marijuana use homophily over the first year of college. This highlights the importance of relationships made early in the first-year of college, as these initial peer ties are likely to reinforce marijuana use behaviors that occur within these relationships.

Indexed as

Marijuana SmokingMarijuana UseSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupStudentsUniversitiesYoung AdultCollegeInfluenceMarijuanaSelectionSocial NetworkStudents

Identifiers

PMID34464915
PMCPMC8785655
OpenAlexW3193481243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.