ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2021
Surgeons' user experience of telemedicine in surgical consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an emphasis on general surgical consultations.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and the eventual national lockdown in the UK brought a halt to the face-to-face outpatient appointments at most NHS hospitals. Owing to this, clinicians have had to switch to other means of consultation, to maintain continuity of care. This survey was done to see how surgeons perceive telemedicine as part of their surgical consultations.
methodsA questionnaire was piloted and re-designed following which an improved questionnaire was circulated among all users of telemedicine in surgical specialties through social media platforms. The results were analysed using smart survey software.
resultsSeventy per cent of the respondents had never used telemedicine before the COVID-19 pandemic. Three-quarters of the respondents found difficulty in assessing patients preoperatively. A significant proportion were worried about confidentiality and data security. The other concerns expressed were difficulty in building a rapport and the absence of a legal framework to support the surgeons in the transition. Despite some concerns, most of them were in favour of using telemedicine in the future with some improvements.
conclusionAs the pandemic prevented people from attending face-to-face appointments, remote consultations were stepped up to help overcome the difficulties. Screening services were suspended and treatment accumulated. Telemedicine will be a corner-stone service as healthcare systems attempt to tackle this backlog. The already existing software need to be further explored. Future studies must address the use of telemedicine in preoperative consultations. Regulatory bodies must ensure that there is adequate legal framework in place so that clinicians continue to embrace telemedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.