ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021
A machine-learning-based method to predict adverse events in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and severely reduced ejection fractions.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: An Integrative Approach.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence for risk stratification of inherited cardiomyopathies in under-resourced settings.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Current Insights and Novel Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques in the Prognosis of Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Deep learning-based prognostic model using non-enhanced cardiac cine MRI for outcome prediction in patients with heart failure.European radiology · 2023Article
- Primer on Machine Learning in Electrophysiology.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2023Review
- Predictive value of electrocardiographic markers in children with dilated cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) are at very high risks of experiencing adverse cardiac events. A machine learning (ML) method could enable more effective risk stratification for these high-risk patients by incorporating various types of data. The aim of this study was to build an ML model to predict adverse events including all-cause deaths and heart transplantation in DCM patients with severely impaired LV systolic function.
methodsOne hundred and eighteen patients with DCM and severely reduced LVEFs (<35%) were included. The baseline clinical characteristics, laboratory data, electrocardiographic, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) features were collected. Various feature selection processes and classifiers were performed to select an ML model with the best performance. The predictive performance of tested ML models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve using 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsTwelve patients died, and 17 patients underwent heart transplantation during the median follow-up of 508 days. The ML model included systolic blood pressure, left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic volume indices, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) extents on CMR imaging, and a support vector machine was selected as a classifier. The model showed excellent performance in predicting adverse events in DCM patients with severely reduced LVEF (the AUC and accuracy values were 0.873 and 0.763, respectively).
conclusionsThis ML technique could effectively predict adverse events in DCM patients with severely reduced LVEF. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The ML method has superior ability in risk stratification in severe DCM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.