Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34464489›Full record

Trial reportBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2021

Does preoperative locally applied estrogen treatment facilitate prolapse-associated symptoms in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse? A randomised controlled double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.

M-L Marschalek, K Bodner, O Kimberger, S Zehetmayer, R Morgenbesser, W Dietrich, C Obruca, H Husslein, W Umek, H Koelbl and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Unraveling the Causal Linkages ofBioMed research international · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M-L MarschalekDepartment of General Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
K BodnerDepartment of General Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
O KimbergerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
S ZehetmayerCentre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems (Institute of Medical Statistics), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
R MorgenbesserDepartment of General Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
W DietrichDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Tulln, Austria.
C ObrucaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tulln, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Tulln, Austria.
H HussleinDepartment of General Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
W UmekDepartment of General Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
H KoelblDepartment of General Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
B Bodner-AdlerDepartment of General Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · ATStatistics Austria · AT

Funding

Montavit Ges.m.b.H.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether locally applied vaginal estrogen affects prolapse-associated complaints compared with placebo treatment in postmenopausal women prior to surgical prolapse repair.

designRandomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.

settingUrogynaecology unit at the Medical University of Vienna and University Hospital of Tulln. POPULATION: Postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and planned surgical prolapse repair.

methodsWomen were randomly assigned local estrogen cream or placebo cream 6 weeks preoperatively.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was differences in subjective prolapse-associated complaints after 6 weeks of treatment prior to surgery, assessed with the comprehensive German pelvic floor questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included differences in other pelvic floor-associated complaints (bladder, bowel or sexual function).

resultsOut of 120 women randomised, 103 (86%) remained for the final analysis. After 6 weeks of treatment the prolapse domain score did not differ between the estrogen and the placebo groups (4.4 ± 0.19 versus 4.6 ± 0.19; mean difference, -0.21; 95% CI -0.74 to 0.33; P = 0.445). Multivariate analysis, including only women receiving the intervention, showed that none of the confounding factors modified the response to estradiol.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that preoperative locally applied estrogen does not ameliorate prolapse-associated symptoms in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Preoperative local estrogen does not ameliorate prolapse-associated symptoms in postmenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseAdministration, IntravaginalAgedDouble-Blind MethodEstradiolEstrogensEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleHumansIntraoperative CareMiddle AgedPelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEstradiolEstrogensEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)Local estrogen therapypelvic organ prolapsepostmenopausal women

Identifiers

PMID34464489
PMCPMC9293194
OpenAlexW3198173244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.