Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34464395›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

The perspectives of health professionals and patients on racism in healthcare: A qualitative systematic review.

Wilson Sim, Wen Hui Lim, Cheng Han Ng, Yip Han Chin, Clyve Yu Leon Yaow, Clare Wei Zhen Cheong, Chin Meng Khoo, Dujeepa D Samarasekera, M Kamala Devi, Choon Seng Chong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Disparities in Pediatric Firearm Injury Care: A Comparison of Chronic Illness Pathways.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Staff perspectives on racial inequities in the neonatal intensive care unit: the REJOICE study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Inequities in prenatal neonatology consultation in high-mortality neonatal populations.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wilson SimYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4273-825X
Wen Hui LimYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Cheng Han NgYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-1569
Yip Han ChinYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Clyve Yu Leon YaowYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Clare Wei Zhen CheongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Chin Meng KhooYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Dujeepa D SamarasekeraCentre for Medical Education, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6916-6741
M Kamala DeviAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5624-9516
Choon Seng ChongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0669-7307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand racial bias in clinical settings from the perspectives of minority patients and healthcare providers to inspire changes in the way healthcare providers interact with their patients.

methodsArticles on racial bias were searched on Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science. Full text review and quality appraisal was conducted, before data was synthesized and analytically themed using the Thomas and Harden methodology.

results23 articles were included, involving 1,006 participants. From minority patients' perspectives, two themes were generated: 1) alienation of minorities due to racial supremacism and lack of empathy, resulting in inadequate medical treatment; 2) labelling of minority patients who were stereotyped as belonging to a lower socio-economic class and having negative behaviors. From providers' perspectives, one theme recurred: the perpetuation of racial fault lines by providers. However, some patients and providers denied racism in the healthcare setting.

conclusionImplicit racial bias is pervasive and manifests in patient-provider interactions, exacerbating health disparities in minorities. Beyond targeted anti-racism measures in healthcare settings, wider national measures to reduce housing, education and income inequality may mitigate racism in healthcare and improve minority patient care.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelRacismDelivery of Health CareEmpathyHealthcare DisparitiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID34464395
PMCPMC8407537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.