Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34464381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells transplanted into a vascularized biodegradable tube containing decellularized allogenic nerve basal laminae promoted peripheral nerve regeneration; can it be an alternative of autologous nerve graft?

Hiroki Tanaka, Ryosuke Kakinoki, Yukitoshi Kaizawa, Hirofumi Yurie, Ryosuke Ikeguchi, Masao Akagi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Nerve regeneration using the Bio 3D nerve conduit fabricated with spheroids.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroki TanakaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1038-1164
Ryosuke KakinokiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9348-1733
Yukitoshi KaizawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Hirofumi YurieDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryosuke IkeguchiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
Masao AkagiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Kindai University Hospital · JPKyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, we showed silicone nerve conduits containing a vascular bundle and decellularized allogenic basal laminae (DABLs) seeded with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) demonstrated successful nerve regeneration. Nerve conduits should be flexible and biodegradable for clinical use. In the current study, we used nerve conduits made of polyglycoric acid (PGA) fiber mesh, which is flexible, biodegradable and capillary-permeable. DABLs were created using chemical surfactants to remove almost all cell debris. In part 1, capillary infiltration capability of the PGA tube was examined. Capillary infiltration into regenerated neural tissue was compared between the PGA tube with blood vessels attached extratubularly (extratubularly vascularized tube) and that containing blood vessels intratubularly (intratubularly vascularized tube). No significant difference was found in capillary formation or nerve regeneration between these two tubes. In part 2, a 20 mm gap created in a rat sciatic nerve model was bridged using the extratubularly vascularized PGA tube containing the DABLs with implantation of isogenic cultured BMSCs (TubeC+ group), that containing the DABLs without implantation of the BMSCs (TubeC- group), and 20 mm-long fresh autologous nerve graft (Auto group). Nerve regeneration in these three groups was assessed electrophysiologically and histomorphometrically. At 24 weeks, there was no significant difference in any electrophysiological parameters between TubeC+ and Auto groups, although all histological parameters in Auto group were significantly greater than those in TubeC+ and TubeC- groups, and TubeC+ group demonstrated significant better nerve regeneration than TubeC- group. The transplanted DABLs showed no signs of immunological rejection and some transplanted BMSCs were differentiated into cells with Schwann cell-like phenotype, which might have promoted nerve regeneration within the conduit. This study indicated that the TubeC+ nerve conduit may become an alternative to nerve autograft.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationNerve RegenerationAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCapillariesCell DifferentiationElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleMesenchymal Stem CellsNeovascularization, PhysiologicPeripheral NervesPermeabilityRatsSciatic NerveTemperatureTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID34464381
PMCPMC8407554
OpenAlexW3197896521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.