ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2022
Morbidity and predictors of delayed recognition of iatrogenic ureteric injuries.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic urinary tract reconstruction for iatrogenic ureteral injuries: a retrospective observational study from a single high-volume referral center.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Ureteroscopy-assisted techniques in laparoscopic repair of middle and lower ureteral stenosis: A retrospective comparative study.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- A delayed diagnosis of iatrogenic ureteral injury results in increased morbidity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Double-J Stent Misplacement in the Inferior Vena Cava and Right Atrium: A Urovascular Nightmare.European urology open science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough intraoperative iatrogenic ureteric injuries (IUI) are rare, significant consequences can occur if they are unrecognized at the time. The focus of our study is to characterize the associated morbidity and identify predictors of delayed recognition of IUI.
methodsSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Research Ethics Board approved the study. Patients with a diagnosis of IUI between 2002 and 2020 were identified through an institutional electronic medical record system. Data pertaining to the demographic characteristics, diagnosis, and management of IUI, as well as overall outcomes were collected retrospectively.
resultsOf the 103 patients identified, 83% were female, 52% had previous abdominal surgery, and 18% had previous radiation. The median age was 67 (range 21-88) years. Twenty percent were not recognized at the time of surgery. Although delayed recognition was not a significant predictor for poor outcome after subsequent repair (i.e., hydronephrosis, ureteric stricture/obstruction), it was associated with substantial morbidity to the patient (i.e., additional procedures) and increased cost to the healthcare system (i.e., longer hospital stay, re-admission to hospital). Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery had an 11 times more likely chance of having an unrecognized IUI as compared to those who underwent open surgery (odds ratio 11.515, p=0.0001).
conclusionsDelayed recognition of IUI may be associated with considerable adverse effects. In this retrospective case series, we identified laparoscopic surgery as a significant predictor for delayed recognition of IUI. This information underscores the need for future studies to facilitate intraoperative identification of ureteric injuries, particularly during laparoscopic procedures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.