Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34464169›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2022

Variants of the Circle of Willis as seen on magnetic resonance angiography and carotid siphon calcifications in community-dwelling older adults.

Oscar H Del Brutto, Bettsy Y Recalde, Robertino M Mera

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oscar H Del BruttoSchool of Medicine, Universidad Espíritu Santo - Ecuador, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-8805
Bettsy Y RecaldeCommunity Center, The Atahualpa Project, Ecuador.
Robertino M MeraDepartment of Epidemiology, Gilead Sciences, Inc., USA.
Gilead Sciences (United States) · USUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeInformation on the association between anatomical variants of the Circle of Willis (CoW) and intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is limited and results are controversial. In this population-based study, we aimed to assess whether an incomplete CoW is associated with high calcium content in carotid siphons (a reliable biomarker of ICAD) in community-dwelling older adults of Amerindian ancestry.

methodsIndividuals aged ≥60 years enrolled in the Three Villages Study received a head computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) of intracranial vessels. The CoW was classified in complete or incomplete according to the presence or absence of one A

resultsA total of 581 individuals were enrolled (mean age: 71 ± 8.4 years; 57% women). MRA revealed an incomplete CoW in 227 (39%) individuals, and high-resolution CT disclosed high calcium content in carotid siphons in 185 (32%). A risk factor logistic regression model showed no independent association between incompleteness of the CoW and high calcium content in carotid siphons (odds ratio: 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.34;

conclusionStudy results disclosed no association between anatomical variants of the CoW and the presence of high calcium content in carotid siphons.

Indexed as

CalcinosisCarotid StenosisAgedCalciumCarotid Artery, InternalCircle of WillisFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleCalciumAmerindiansanatomical variantscalcium content in carotid siphonsCircle of Willisintracranial atherosclerotic diseasepopulation study

Identifiers

PMID34464169
PMCPMC9244749
OpenAlexW3198890360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.