Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34464084›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2021

Dissecting the Binding Profile of PET Tracers to Corticobasal Degeneration Tau Fibrils.

Yang Zhou, Junhao Li, Agneta Nordberg, Hans Ågren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Developing a novel reference region for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Tracing synaptic loss in Alzheimer's brain with SV2A PET-tracer UCB-J.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of Tau Radiotracers in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang ZhouDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden.
Junhao LiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden.
Agneta NordbergDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, 141 84, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hans ÅgrenDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1763-9383
Uppsala University · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease and primary tauopathies are characterized by the presence of tau pathology in brain. Several tau positron emission tomography (PET) tracers have been developed and studied in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but there is still a lack of 4R-tau specific tracers for non-AD tauopathies. We here present the first computational study on the binding profiles of four tau different PET tracers, PI2620, CBD2115, PM-PBB3, and MK6240, to corticobasal degeneration (CBD) tau. The

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseTauopathiesBrainHumansPositron-Emission Tomographytau Proteinstau ProteinsAlzheimer diseasebinding profileCorticobasal degenerationfree energy surfacemetadynamicspositron emission tomography tracer

Identifiers

PMID34464084
PMCPMC8447187
OpenAlexW3196899210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.