Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34463785›Full record

Observational studyHerz2022

Unexpected high level of severe events even in low-risk profile chest pain unit patients.

Frank Breuckmann, Stephan Settelmeier, Tienush Rassaf, Matthias Hochadel, Bernd Nowak, Thomas Voigtländer, Evangelos Giannitsis, Jochen Senges, Thomas Münzel

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Herz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Frank BreuckmannDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. frank.breuckmann@uk-essen.de.
Stephan SettelmeierDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Tienush RassafDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Matthias HochadelInstitute for Myocardial Infarction Research Foundation, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Bernd NowakCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Thomas VoigtländerCardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Evangelos Giannitsis3rd Department of Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jochen SengesInstitute for Myocardial Infarction Research Foundation, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Thomas MünzelDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DECardiovascular Center Bethanien · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

The German CPU registry II was financially supported by the DGK, the German Heart Foundation and Abbott Vascular. The present analysis was funded by the German Heart Foundation. n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEarly heart attack awareness programs are thought to increase efficacy of chest pain units (CPU) by providing live-saving information to the community. We hypothesized that self-referral might be a feasible alternative to activation of emergency medical services (EMS) in selected chest pain patients with a specific low-risk profile. METHODS AND

resultsIn this observational registry-based study, data from 4743 CPU patients were analyzed for differences between those with or without severe or fatal prehospital or in-unit events (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and/or in-unit death, resuscitation or ventricular tachycardia). In order to identify a low-risk subset in which early self-referral might be recommended to reduce prehospital critical time intervals, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score for in-hospital mortality and a specific low-risk CPU score developed from the data by multivariate regression analysis were applied and corresponding event rates were calculated. Male gender, cardiac symptoms other than chest pain, first onset of symptoms and a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure or cardioverter defibrillator implantation increased propensity for critical events. Event rates within the low-risk subsets varied from 0.5-2.8%. Those patients with preinfarction angina experienced fewer events.

conclusionsWhen educating patients and the general population about angina pectoris symptoms and early admission, activation of EMS remains recommended. Even in patients without any CPU-specific risk factor, self-referral bears the risk of severe or fatal pre- or in-unit events of 0.6%. However, admission should not be delayed, and self-referral might be feasible in patients with previous symptoms of preinfarction angina.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesMyocardial InfarctionAngina, UnstableChest PainElectrocardiographyHumansMaleChest pain unitEarly heart attack carePreinfarction anginaScoreSelf-referral

Identifiers

PMID34463785
PMCPMC9355921
OpenAlexW3196388452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.