ArticleClinical neuroradiology2022
Automated Detection of Ischemic Stroke and Subsequent Patient Triage in Routinely Acquired Head CT.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive and operational artificial intelligence in emergency radiology for early risk stratification in acute care settings: a scoping review.European radiology · 2026Article
- Current perspective in acute ischemic stroke: net water uptake and imaging-guided selection as bridges to personalized, tissue-based care.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-based Assessment of Internal Carotid Artery Anatomy to Predict Difficult Intracranial Access in Endovascular Recanalization of Acute Ischemic Stroke.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Faster and Better: How Anomaly Detection Can Accelerate and Improve Reporting of Head Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdvanced machine-learning (ML) techniques can potentially detect the entire spectrum of pathology through deviations from a learned norm. We investigated the utility of a weakly supervised ML tool to detect characteristic findings related to ischemic stroke in head CT and provide subsequent patient triage.
methodsPatients having undergone non-enhanced head CT at a tertiary care hospital in April 2020 with either no anomalies, subacute or chronic ischemia, lacunar infarcts of the deep white matter or hyperdense vessel signs were retrospectively analyzed. Anomaly detection was performed using a weakly supervised ML classifier. Findings were displayed on a voxel-level (heatmap) and pooled to an anomaly score. Thresholds for this score classified patients into i) normal, ii) inconclusive, iii) pathological. Expert-validated radiological reports were considered as ground truth. Test assessment was performed with ROC analysis; inconclusive results were pooled to pathological predictions for accuracy measurements.
resultsDuring the investigation period 208 patients were referred for head CT of which 111 could be included. Definite ratings into normal/pathological were feasible in 77 (69.4%) patients. Based on anomaly scores, the AUC to differentiate normal from pathological scans was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-1.00). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 40.6%, 80.6% and 100%, respectively.
conclusionOur study demonstrates the potential of a weakly supervised anomaly-detection tool to detect stroke findings in head CT. Definite classification into normal/pathological was made with high accuracy in > 2/3 of patients. Anomaly heatmaps further provide guidance towards pathologies, also in cases with inconclusive ratings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.