Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34463775›Full record

ReviewEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2022

Non-contact elastography methods in mechanobiology: a point of view.

Silvia Caponi, Alessandra Passeri, Giulio Capponi, Daniele Fioretto, Massimo Vassalli, Maurizio Mattarelli

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tissue histology on the correlation between fracture energy and elasticity.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Editors' roundup: October 2022.Biophysical reviews · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanoengineering for Mechanobiology "N4M-20".European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Silvia CaponiIstituto Officina dei Materiali, National Research Council (IOM-CNR), Unit of Perugia, c/o Department of Physics and Geology, University of Perugia, 06123, Perugia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4219-3256
Alessandra PasseriDepartment of Physics and Geology, University of Perugia, 06123, Perugia, Italy.
Giulio CapponiDepartment of Physics and Geology, University of Perugia, 06123, Perugia, Italy.
Daniele FiorettoDepartment of Physics and Geology, University of Perugia, 06123, Perugia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4487-0035
Massimo VassalliJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3063-4376
Maurizio MattarelliDepartment of Physics and Geology, University of Perugia, 06123, Perugia, Italy. maurizio.mattarelli@unipg.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9184-7968
University of Perugia · ITUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

royal society international exchange program IEC\R2\202232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, mechanobiology has emerged as a novel perspective in the context of basic biomedical research. It is now widely recognized that living cells respond not only to chemical stimuli (for example drugs), but they are also able to decipher mechanical cues, such as the rigidity of the underlying matrix or the presence of shear forces. Probing the viscoelastic properties of cells and their local microenvironment with sub-micrometer resolution is required to study this complex interplay and dig deeper into the mechanobiology of single cells. Current approaches to measure mechanical properties of adherent cells mainly rely on the exploitation of miniaturized indenters, to poke single cells while measuring the corresponding deformation. This method provides a neat implementation of the everyday approach to measure mechanical properties of a material, but it typically results in a very low throughput and invasive experimental protocol, poorly translatable towards three-dimensional living tissues and biological constructs. To overcome the main limitations of nanoindentation experiments, a radical paradigm change is foreseen, adopting next generation contact-less methods to measure mechanical properties of biological samples with sub-cell resolution. Here we briefly introduce the field of single cell mechanical characterization, and we concentrate on a promising high resolution optical elastography technique, Brillouin spectroscopy. This non-contact technique is rapidly emerging as a potential breakthrough innovation in biomechanics, but the application to single cells is still in its infancy.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesBiomechanical PhenomenaBiophysicsSpectrum AnalysisBioimagingBrillouin spectroscopyElastographyMechanobiology

Identifiers

PMID34463775
PMCPMC8964566
OpenAlexW3196527957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.