ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Quantitative evaluation of prospective motion correction in healthy subjects at 7T MRI.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective motion correction with data reacquisition based on fat navigators for T1-weighted brain MRI at 3T.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Quantitative evaluation of radiotherapy accuracy in head and neck cancer: correcting cbct image distortions for improved tumour targeting and dose assessment.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- Assessing Arterial Patterns in the Motor Cortex With 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Vessel Distance Mapping.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Prospective 3D Fat Navigator (FatNav) motion correction for 7T Terra MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Effects of prospective motion correction on perivascular spaces at 7T MRI evaluated using motion artifact simulation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- DS6, Deformation-Aware Semi-Supervised Learning: Application to Small Vessel Segmentation with Noisy Training Data.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeQuantitative assessment of prospective motion correction (PMC) capability at 7T MRI for compliant healthy subjects to improve high-resolution images in the absence of intentional motion.
methodsTwenty-one healthy subjects were imaged at 7 T. They were asked not to move, to consider only unintentional motion. An in-bore optical tracking system was used to monitor head motion and consequently update the imaging volume. For all subjects, high-resolution T
resultsSubjective evaluation overall has shown a statistically significant improvement (5.5%) in terms of image quality with PMC ON. In a separate evaluation of every contrast, three of the four contrasts (T
conclusionBased on subjective assessment, PMC improved image quality in high-resolution images of healthy compliant subjects in the absence of intentional motion for all contrasts except
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.