Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34463148›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society2022

"I worry about this patient EVERY day": Geriatrics Clinicians' Challenges in Caring for Unrepresented Older Adults.

Kara B Dassel, Linda S Edelman, Jennifer Moye, Casey Catlin, Timothy W Farrell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The clock-drawing test: reading temporalities of dementia from clinical chart notes.The journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kara B DasselUniversity of UT, Salt Lake City, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8236-9693
Linda S EdelmanUniversity of UT, Salt Lake City, USA.
Jennifer MoyeBoston VA Research Institute, Inc., MA, USA.
Casey CatlinBoston VA Research Institute, Inc., MA, USA.
Timothy W FarrellUniversity of UT, Salt Lake City, USA.
University of Utah · USBoston VA Research Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Intramural VA VA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unrepresented older adults are at risk for adverse outcomes, and clinicians who care for them may face ethical dilemmas and unique challenges when making person-centered care recommendations. However, little is known about their perspectives on clinical challenges in caring for this population. An online survey was used to assess issues around providing care for unrepresented patients. Ninety-two American Geriatrics Society members working with older adults in inpatient and/or outpatient settings completed the survey. Descriptive qualitative analysis of narrative survey responses identified five broad themes: (a) health risk characteristics of patients, (b) care decisions facing the team, (c) psychosocial considerations by the team, (d) patient outcomes, and (e) burden of the provider and/or health system. These findings demonstrate that geriatrics clinicians face challenges in working with unrepresented adults in both inpatient and outpatient settings. We interpret these results in light of existing literature and propose collaborative approaches that may improve outcomes.

Indexed as

GeriatricsAgedHumansUnited Statesadvance care planning/directiveshealth outcomesqualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID34463148
PMCPMC8978333
OpenAlexW3198778407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.