Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34463015›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental ophthalmology2021

Microbiological diagnosis of endophthalmitis using nanopore targeted sequencing.

Qiong Huang, Aisi Fu, Yiyan Wang, Jie Zhang, Wanxu Zhao, Yang Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for comprehensive pathogen detection in intraocular infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiong HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Aisi FuKey Laboratory of Combinatorial Biosynthesis and Drug Discovery, Ministry of Education and Wuhan University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Yiyan WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wanxu ZhaoKey Laboratory of Combinatorial Biosynthesis and Drug Discovery, Ministry of Education and Wuhan University School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wuhan, China.
Yang ChengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9863-4906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroorganism identification is critical for the early diagnosis and management of infectious endophthalmitis, but traditional culture can yield false-negative results. Nanopore targeted sequencing (NTS) is a third-generation sequencing technique with multiple advantages. This study aimed to test aqueous humour or vitreous fluid samples from presumed cases of infectious endophthalmitis using NTS to evaluate the feasibility of NTS in diagnosing endophthalmitis, especially for culture-negative cases.

methodsThis prospective study enrolled patients who presented to the Department of Ophthalmology of Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) between June 2018 and December 2020. The samples were sent immediately for routine microbiology culture processing and NTS assay.

resultsNTS identified microorganisms in 17 of 18 cases (94.4%) (eight culture-positive cases, nine culture-negative cases, and one case unavailable for culture). There was a high-quality match between culture and NTS for culture-positive cases. In the eight culture-negative cases and the case unavailable for culture, NTS detected either bacteria, fungi, or a mixture of bacteria and fungi in the intraocular fluids. The average waiting times for the results of bacterial and fungal cultures were 48 and 72 h, respectively. The average time for the NTS results was 12 h.

conclusionsNTS appears to be a promising diagnostic platform for diagnosing infectious endophthalmitis, even for culture-negative cases.

Indexed as

EndophthalmitisEye Infections, BacterialNanoporesBacteriaHumansProspective StudiesVitreous Bodycultureendophthalmitisfalse-negativenanopore targeted sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34463015
PMCPMC9292959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.