Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34463009›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2022

Lessons learned from people with neurological diseases at the time of COVID-19: The EFNA-EAN survey.

Benedetta Bodini, Elena Moro, Joke Jaarsma, Elizabeth Cunningham, Johann Sellner, Donna Walsh, EANcore COVID-19 Task Force

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Is there still hesitancy towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among people with neurological disease- a survey of the NeuroCOVID-19 task force of the European Academy of Neurology.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. European Academy of Neurology: First 10 years.European journal of neurology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. EFAS/EAN survey on the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on European clinical autonomic education and research.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Benedetta BodiniParis Brain Institute, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8010-1220
Elena MoroDivision of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7968-5908
Joke JaarsmaEuropean Federation of Neurological Associations, Brussels, Belgium.
Elizabeth CunninghamEuropean Federation of Neurological Associations, Brussels, Belgium.
Johann SellnerDepartment of Neurology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8749-5533
Donna WalshEuropean Federation of Neurological Associations, Brussels, Belgium.
EANcore COVID-19 Task Force
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRFORCE Technology (Norway) · NOLandesklinikum Korneuburg · ATSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe European Federation of Neurological Associations (EFNA), in partnership with the NeuroCOVID-19 taskforce of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN), has investigated the impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals with neurological diseases, as well as the hopes and fears of these patients about the post-pandemic phase.

methodsAn EFNA-EAN survey was available online to any person living with a neurological disorder in Europe. It consisted of 18 items concerning the impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on the medical care of people with neurological disorders, and the hopes and fears of these individuals regarding the post-pandemic phase.

resultsFor 44.4% of the 443 survey participants, the overall care of their neurological disease during the pandemic was inappropriate. This perception was mainly due to significant delays in accessing medical care (25.7%), insufficiently reliable information received about the potential impact of COVID-19 on their neurological disease (49.6%), and a substantial lack of involvement in their disease management decisions (54.3%). Participants indicated that their major concerns for the post-pandemic phase were experiencing longer waiting times to see a specialist (24.1%), suffering from social isolation and deteriorating mental well-being (23.1%), and facing delays in clinical trials with disinvestment in neuroscience research (13.1%).

conclusionsDespite the great efforts of health services to cope with the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals with neurological conditions feel they have been left behind. These findings provide invaluable insights for improving the care of patients with neurological disorders in the further course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Nervous System DiseasesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaireschronic disordersCOVID-19medical careneurologypeople with neurological diseaseperspectivesurvey

Identifiers

PMID34463009
PMCPMC8652681
OpenAlexW3197341570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.