Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34462979›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of cancer care2021

Health-related quality of life and treatment effects in patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elsa M Ronde, Charlotte M Heidsma, Anne M Eskes, Josefine E Schopman, Elisabeth J M Nieveen van Dijkum

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of cancer care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elsa M RondeDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4526-351X
Charlotte M HeidsmaDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anne M EskesDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Josefine E SchopmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth J M Nieveen van DijkumDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEPNENs) are often diagnosed in an advanced stage. As the optimal sequence of therapy remains largely unclear, all treatment-related outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) prospects, should be assessed according to patients' preferences.

methodsA targeted search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies on treatment effect and HRQoL, measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 tool, in patients with advanced, well-differentiated GEPNENs. Study quality was assessed, and meta-analyses were performed for global health status/QOL and tumour response.

resultsThe search yielded 1,322 records, and 20 studies were included, examining somatostatin analogues (SSA), peptide receptor radionuclide therapies (PRRT), chemotherapy, SSA-based combination therapies, and targeted therapies. Global HRQoL was stable, and rates for disease stabilisation were moderate to high across all treatments. Meta-analyses for global health status/QOL after SSA treatment were not significant (mean difference: -0.3 [95% CI: -1.3 to 0.7]). The highest pooled overall tumour response rate was 33% (95% CI: 24-45%) for PRRT. The highest pooled clinical benefit rate was 94% (95% CI: 65-99%) for chemotherapy.

conclusionAll treatments appeared beneficial for disease stabilisation while maintaining stable global health status/QOL. High-quality HRQoL reporting was lacking. HRQoL should be a central outcome next to well-established outcomes.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsHumansQuality of Lifeadverse drug eventsneoplasmsneuroendocrine tumourquality of lifetreatmenttreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID34462979
PMCPMC9286581
OpenAlexW3197121385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.