Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34462838›Full record

ArticleDoklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections2021

In vitro Regeneration of Hyssopus officinalis L. and Plant Genetic Similarity.

I V Bulavin, N N Ivanova, I V Mitrofanova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I V BulavinFederal State Funded Institution of Science "The Labor Red Banner Order Nikita Botanical Gardens-National Scientific Center of the RAS", Yalta, Russia. labgennbs@yandex.ru.
N N IvanovaFederal State Funded Institution of Science "The Labor Red Banner Order Nikita Botanical Gardens-National Scientific Center of the RAS", Yalta, Russia.
I V MitrofanovaFederal State Funded Institution of Science "The Labor Red Banner Order Nikita Botanical Gardens-National Scientific Center of the RAS", Yalta, Russia.
Nikita Botanical Gardens · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biotechnological methods are an essential component of plant genetic resources investigation that allow both to preserve a rare natural plant and useful selection genotypes, especially essential oil bearing plants used in medicine, perfume, food, etc. In the clonal micropropagation in vitro, the key moment is to retain genetic stability of in vitro material. It is considered that plant regeneration in vitro from meristem or vegetative buds gives identical clones, but the effect of the medium growth regulators on the genetic stability of in vitro plant material is discussed. Therefore, the objective of our work was to evaluate the genetic similarity of ex situ and in vitro plants. Investigation was performed on Hyssopus officinalis L. cv. Nikitskiy Beliy (NBG selection). Regeneration from the shoot single-node segments on the modified Murashige and Skoog culture medium (MS) supplemented with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) in concentration 0.3-0.9 mg/L and 0.1 mg/L Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) was carried out. It was established, that application of 0.5 mg/L BAP was sufficient for the organ formation and development without morphological deviations. Genetic analysis based on RAPD and ISSR-PCR had shown full genetic similarity of the investigated ex situ and in vitro plants.

Indexed as

Hyssopus PlantPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ShootsRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniquePlant Growth Regulatorsex situ plantsgenetic similarityHyssopus officinalis L.in vitro regenerationISSRRAPD

Identifiers

PMID34462838
OpenAlexW3196467632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.