Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34462817›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Bowel Anastomosis After or Before HIPEC: A Comparative Study in Patients Undergoing CRS+HIPEC for Peritoneal Surface Malignancy.

S P Somashekhar, Kumar C Rohit, Yethadka Ramya, Shabber S Zaveri, Vijay Ahuja, Arun Kumar Namachivayam, K R Ashwin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S P SomashekharManipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Kumar C RohitManipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India. drrohit.life@gmail.com.
Yethadka RamyaManipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Shabber S ZaveriManipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Vijay AhujaManipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Arun Kumar NamachivayamDepartment of Data Science, Alke Research Private Limited, Bengaluru, India.
K R AshwinManipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Manipal Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leak after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains a dreaded complication. There is no consensus statement regarding the optimal timing for bowel anastomoses to perform after or before HIPEC.

methodsPatients who underwent CRS+HIPEC and had at least one bowel anastomosis were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate if timing of anastomosis done after or before HIPEC had an impact on bowel complication rates (anastomotic leak and perforation).

resultsFrom 2013 to 2019, 214 of 370 patients underwent CRS+HIPEC and had at least one bowel anastomosis. Of these 214 patients, 104 and 110 patients had anastomosis after and before HIPEC, respectively. A total of 324 anastomoses were performed, with a mean of 0.87 anastomoses per patient (range 1-4). The incidence of anastomotic leaks was comparable between the pre- and post-HIPEC groups (3.6% vs. 4.8%; p > 0.05), as was the bowel complication rate (7.6% vs. 7.2%). After multivariate analysis, prior surgical score >1 (odds ratio [OR] 4.3), recurrent cancers (OR 7.4), and more than two anastomosis (OR 3.8) were considered independent risk factors for bowel complications.

conclusionAnastomosis of the bowel performed after or before HIPEC does not affect bowel complication rates (leak/perforation). Higher prior surgical score, surgery for recurrent cancers, and more than two bowel anastomosis are independent risk factors for predicting bowel complications. Prehabilitation, standardization of steps, immediate attention and repair of serosal tears, and thorough inspection of the bowel before closure helps to decrease bowel complications. The timing of anastomosis can be at the discretion of the surgeon.

Indexed as

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyPeritoneal NeoplasmsAnastomosis, SurgicalCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34462817
OpenAlexW3197335831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.