Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34462804›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2021

Amplification of cestode DNA from the peri-anal region of naturally infected foxes by PCR and LAMP: proof of concept for a potential sampling strategy for diagnosing human taeniosis.

Gillian Muchaamba, Cristian A Alvarez Rojas, Peter Deplazes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cestodes in Eurasian wolves (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  2. Prevalence ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  3. Immunoassay for detection ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gillian Muchaamba *Institute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse and Medical Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-3318
Cristian A Alvarez Rojas *Institute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse and Medical Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8069-7607
Peter DeplazesInstitute of Parasitology, Vetsuisse and Medical Faculty, University of Zürich, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland. deplazesp@access.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1118-5405
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of human taeniosis can be achieved through coproscopy, ELISA or PCR. An important limitation of these methods is the high turnaround time for stool sample collection and preparation, indicating the need for a straightforward sampling strategy. Due to the high metabolic activity and reproductive potential of Taenia spp., we hypothesise that parasite DNA (cells and eggs) present in the peri-anal region of the host can be exploited as a target for molecular diagnosis. We evaluated the feasibility of recovering parasite DNA from the peri-anal area of foxes naturally infected with Taenia spp. Before necropsy, cotton swabs were rubbed at the peri-anal region of foxes. DNA was extracted using alkaline lysis coupled with a commercial DNA isolation kit (method A) or alkaline lysis alone (method B). DNA was used in the multiplex-PCR assay (previously described and called here swab-PCR) and a novel LAMP assay detecting Taenia spp. commonly found in foxes (swab-LAMP). The results of these assays from 105 foxes were compared with the presence of intestinal helminths determined at necropsy and by the sedimentation and counting technique (SCT). The sensitivity of swab-PCR for detecting Taenia (n = 68) was 89.8% (95% CI, 77.7-96.6) and 89.5% (66.9-98.7) using methods A and B, respectively. The sensitivity of the swab-LAMP assay was 83.7% (70.3-92.7) using method A and 89.5% (66.9-98.7) with method B. We postulate that peri-anal swab sampling followed by simplified DNA extraction and LAMP might be a suitable strategy for surveillance of human taeniosis in resource-limited settings in the future.

Indexed as

CestodaFoxesAnimalsDNA, HelminthHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, HelminthCestodeDNADNA extractionLoop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)Peri-anal swabsPolymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Identifiers

PMID34462804
PMCPMC8405393
OpenAlexW3196623346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.