ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2022
Breast Equalization Augmentation: The Use of Ultrasonic Assisted Liposuction for Correction of Primary Breast Asymmetry with Bilateral Augmentation.
Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast Reconstruction following Mastectomy for Breast Cancer or Prophylactic Mastectomy: Therapeutic Options and Results.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of using ultrasonic assisted liposuction (UAL) to achieve sufficient breast symmetry allowing for the use of same sized implants in patients presenting for elective breast augmentation surgery.
methodsA retrospective review was performed of patients presenting for augmentation mammoplasty with breast asymmetry who underwent ultrasonic assisted liposuction in combination with implant augmentation. Pre-operative differences in breast volumes were determined using water displacement, and these measurements were compared to final lipoaspirates required to achieve symmetry. To estimate the volume of lipoaspirate required, we suggested to aim for twice the volume difference obtained by water displacement. The success of the procedure was measured by the ability to use the same size implants bilaterally.
resultsA total of 35 patients were included in this review. In 85% of patients, UAL was sufficient to permit the use of equally sized implants bilaterally. However, when different sized implants were required, the size difference between implants was not greater than 25 cc. The UAL was also effective in correcting minor ptosis and nipple position. The main observed disadvantage was prolonged bruising and swelling.
conclusionThe use of UAL for correction of primary breast asymmetry with bilateral breast augmentation allows balancing of breast tissue volumes and the use of same size implants and eliminates the need for balancing mastopexy procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.