ArticleAnnals of hematology2021
Ruxolitinib-treated polycythemia vera patients and their risk of secondary malignancies.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in Japanese patients with polycythemia vera: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.International journal of hematology · 2022Trial
- Cutaneous melanoma and JAK inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis in EudraVigilance.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Dermatologic Toxicities Induced by JAK Inhibitors.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Long-Term Safety Profile of Ruxolitinib in Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Comprehensive Real-World Analysis.EJHaem · 2025Article
- Second malignancies among older patients with classical myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with ruxolitinib.Blood neoplasia · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Precision Dosing of Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Incidence rate and risk factors of second primary neoplasms among older patients with hematological malignancies: Insights from a Chinese single-center experience (1997-2021).Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2024Article
- Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part I: Cancer Risk. A Narrative Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2024Review
- Skin Malignancies Due to Anti-Cancer Therapies.Cancers · 2024Review
- Genetic and immunohistochemical profiling of NK/T-cell lymphomas reveals prognostically relevant BCOR-MYC association.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Article
- Safety and effectiveness of ruxolitinib in the real-world management of polycythemia vera patients: a collaborative retrospective study by pH-negative MPN latial group.Annals of hematology · 2022Article
- Second Cancer Onset in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: What, When, Why?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- JAK2 in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Still a Protagonist.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, there has been increased concern about a risk of secondary malignancies (SM) occurring in myelofibrosis (MF) patients receiving ruxolitinib (RUX). In polycythemia vera (PV), on the other hand, only limited data on the risk of SM under RUX treatment are available. To investigate the association between RUX therapy in PV and SM, we conducted a retrospective, single-center study that included 289 PV patients. RUX was administered to 32.9% (95/289) of patients for a median treatment duration of 48.0 months (range 1.0-101.6). Within a median follow-up of 97 months (1.0-395.0) after PV diagnosis, 24 SM occurred. Comparing the number of PV patients with RUX-associated SM (n = 10, 41.7%) with the 14 (58.3%) patients who developed SM without RUX, no significant difference (p = 0.34, chi square test) was found. No increased incidences of melanoma, lymphoma, or solid "non-skin" malignancies were observed with RUX (p = 0.31, p = 0.60, and p = 0.63, respectively, chi square test). However, significantly more NMSC occurred in association with RUX treatment (p = 0.03, chi-squared test). The "SM-free survival" was not significantly different by log rank test for all 289 patients (p = 0.65), for the patients (n = 208; 72%) receiving cytoreductive therapy (p = 0.48) or for different therapy sequences (p = 0.074). In multivariate analysis, advanced age at PV diagnosis (HR 1.062 [95% CI 1.028, 1.098]) but not administration of RUX (HR 1.068 [95% CI 0.468, 2.463]) was associated with an increased risk for SM (p = 0.005). According to this retrospective analysis, no increased risk of SM due to RUX treatment could be substantiated for PV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.