Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34462007›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2021

Adjunctive ketamine for sedation in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: an active-controlled, pilot, feasibility clinical trial.

Marwa Amer, Khalid Maghrabi, Mohammed Bawazeer, Kamel Alshaikh, Mohammad Shaban, Muhammad Rizwan, Rashid Amin, Edward De Vol, Mawadah Baali, Malak Altewerki and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075006 (Adjunct Low Dose Ketamine Infusion Versus Standard of Care in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients at a Tertiary Saudi Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04075006 phase3completednot on this map

Adjunct Low Dose Ketamine Infusion Versus Standard of Care in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients at a Tertiary Saudi Hospital: Randomized, Prospective, Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CenterRan2019 to 2021Enrolled84ConditionsCritical Illness, Sedation, Mechanical VentilationArmsKetamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Ketamine-based Sedation Use in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Efficacy and safety of ketamine in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: a scoping review (erratum).Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marwa AmerPharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, (MBC # 11), PO Box 3354, Riyadh, 11211, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. mamer@kfshrc.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9497-1451
Khalid MaghrabiCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed BawazeerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Kamel AlshaikhDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad ShabanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad RizwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rashid AminPharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, (MBC # 11), PO Box 3354, Riyadh, 11211, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Edward De VolBiostatistics, Epidemiology & Scientific Computing Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mawadah BaaliBiostatistics, Epidemiology & Scientific Computing Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Malak AltewerkiDepartment of Neurosciences, Residency Training Program, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mehreen BanoDepartments of Nursing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fawziah AlkhaldiDepartments of Nursing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sanaa AlenaziDepartments of Nursing, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed HijaziDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAAlfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveKetamine has been shown to decrease sedative requirements in intensive care unit (ICU). Randomized trials are limited on patient-centered outcomes. We designed this pilot trial to evaluate the feasibility of a large randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing the effect of ketamine as an adjunct analgosedative compared with standard of care alone as a control group (CG) in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation (MV). We also provided preliminary evidence on clinically relevant outcomes to plan a larger trial. MATERIAL AND

methodsPilot, active-controlled, open-label RCT was conducted at medical, surgical, and transplant ICUs at a large tertiary and quaternary care medical institution (King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia). The study included adult patients who were intubated within 24 h, expected to require MV for the next calendar day, and had institutional pain and sedation protocol initiated. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to adjunct ketamine infusion 1-2 μg/kg/min for 48 h or CG alone.

resultsOf 437 patients screened from September 2019 through November 2020, 83 (18.9%) patients were included (43 in CG and 40 in ketamine) and 352 (80.5%) were excluded. Average enrollment rate was 3-4 patients/month. Consent and protocol adherence rates were adequate (89.24% and 76%, respectively). Demographics were balanced between groups. Median MV duration was 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-9.25 days) in ketamine and 5 (IQR 2-8 days) in CG. Median VFDs was 19 (IQR 0-24.75 days) in ketamine and 19 (IQR 0-24 days) in the CG (p = 0.70). More patients attained goal Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale at 24 and 48 h in ketamine (67.5% and 73.5%, respectively) compared with CG (52.4% and 66.7%, respectively). Sedatives and vasopressors cumulative use, and hemodynamic changes were similar. ICU length-of-stay was 12.5 (IQR 6-21.2 days) in ketamine, compared with 12 (IQR 5.5-23 days) in CG. No serious adverse events were observed in either group.

conclusionsKetamine as an adjunct analgosedative agent appeared to be feasible and safe with no negative impact on outcomes, including hemodynamics. This pilot RCT identified areas of improvement in study protocol before conducting a large, adequately powered, multicenter RCT which is likely justified to investigate ketamine association with patient-centered outcomes further. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04075006. Registered on 30 August 2019. Current controlled trials: ISRCTN14730035. Registered on 3 February 2020.

Indexed as

ATTAINMENTCritical careKetamineMechanical ventilationPilotSedationStandard of care

Identifiers

PMID34462007
PMCPMC8404029
OpenAlexW3196525744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.