Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34461984›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2021

DArT-based evaluation of soybean germplasm from Polish Gene Bank.

Elzbieta Czembor, Jerzy H Czembor, Radoslaw Suchecki, Nathan S Watson-Haigh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elzbieta CzemborPlant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-NRI, Radzikow, Blonie, Poland.
Jerzy H CzemborPlant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-NRI, Radzikow, Blonie, Poland.
Radoslaw SucheckiCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Urrbrae, SA, 5064, Australia.
Nathan S Watson-HaighSouth Australian Genomics Centre, SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. nathan.watson-haigh@sa-genomics.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7935-6151

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju 1/394826/10/NCBR/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSoybean is an important plant used for food, feed and many industrial purposes. Interest in soybean breeding is growing in Central Europe, including Poland. A very large number of soybean accessions are stored in gene banks, but less than 1% of them have been used for breeding. Here, we present genotypic data as well as phenotypic data on plant and seed performance, including seed chlorophyll fluorescence traits, and on yield components within a collection of soybean accessions that are conserved in the Polish Gene Bank at the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-National Research Institute.

resultsThe materials used consisted of sub-collections: 79 Polish genotypes, including old traditional cultivars, 24 Canadian, 21 American, 21 Swedish and 31 from Central and Eastern European Countries, 9 from France and 6 from Japan. In total, 9602 high quality SNPs were derived from DArTseq, a method utilising GBS technology. GWAS, performed with the BLINK model, revealed that a total of 41 significant SNPs were mapped for days to flowering, flower colour, plant height, days to pod formation, 100 seed weight, pod colour, seeds and hilum colour and steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence under light (Ft_Lss). This is the first report about the diversity of traditional old Polish soybean cultivars.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGlycine maxCanadaGenome, PlantPlant BreedingPolandUnited StatesBiodiversityGenetic resourcesGenome-wide association studyGenomic selectionGenotyping-by-sequencingGlycine maxPlant MaturityPlant performanceSeed performanceYield components

Identifiers

PMID34461984
PMCPMC8404325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.