Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34461872›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Remote interviews for medical residency selection during the initial COVID-19 crisis: a national survey.

Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Fadiah Alkhattabi, Fadi Aljamaan, Khalid Alhasan, Adi Alherbish, Mona Philby, Fahad Alsohime, Mohamad Alobaylan, Hayfa Alabdulkarim, Badr Almosned and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamad-Hani TemsahPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO BOX 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-9322
Fadiah AlkhattabiPediatric Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fadi AljamaanCritical Care Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-6652
Khalid AlhasanPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO BOX 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4291-8536
Adi AlherbishPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO BOX 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.
Mona PhilbyPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO BOX 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad AlsohimePediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO BOX 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4979-3895
Mohamad AlobaylanPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO BOX 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.
Hayfa AlabdulkarimPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO BOX 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.
Badr AlmosnedPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO BOX 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.
Deema GashgareyPediatric Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2655-8809
Ghadah FelimbanPediatric Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ziyad AlkathiriPediatric Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-4314
Randa AlmaghrabiPediatric Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amr JamalDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. amrjamal@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-6592
Mazin BarryDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2274-007X
Sami A AlhaiderSaudi Commission For Healthcare Specialties, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Basim AlsaywidSaudi Commission For Healthcare Specialties, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad A BashiriPediatric Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO BOX 2925, Riyadh, 11461, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKing Saud Medical City · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SASaudi Commission for Health Specialties · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical training programs candidate's interview is an integral part of the residency matching process. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, conducting these interviews was challenging due to infection prevention restrains (social distancing, namely) and travel restrictions. E-interviews were implemented by the Saudi Commission for Healthcare Specialties (SCFHS) since the matching cycle of March 2020 to hold the interviews in a safer virtual environment while maintaining the same matching quality and standards.

aimThis study was conducted to assess the medical training residency program applicants' satisfaction, stress, and other perspectives for the (SCFHS) March 2020 Matching-cycle conducted through an urgently implemented E-interviews process.

methodA cross-sectional, nationwide survey (Additional file 1) was sent to 4153 residency-nominated applicants to the (SCFHS) March 2020 cycle.

resultsAmong the 510 candidates who responded, 62.2% applied for medical specialties, 20.2% applied for surgical specialties, and 17.6% applied for critical care and emergency specialties. Most respondents (61.2%) never had previous experience with web-based video conferences. Most respondents (80.2%) used the Zoom application to conduct the current E-interviews, whereas only 15.9% used the FaceTime application. 63.3% of the respondents preferred E-interviews over in-person interviews, and 60.6% rated their experience as very good or excellent. 75.7% of the respondents agreed that all their residency program queries were adequately addressed during the E-interviews. At the same time, 52.2% of them agreed that E-interviews allowed them to represent themselves accurately. 28.2% felt no stress at all with their E-interviews experience, while 41.2% felt little stressed and only 8.2% felt highly stressed. The factors that were independently and inversely associated with applicants' level of stress with E-interviews experience were their ability to represent themselves during the interviews (p = 0.001), cost-savings (p < 0.001), their overall rating of the E-interviews quality (p = 0.007) and the speed of the internet connection (p < 0.006).

conclusionVideoconferencing was implemented on an urgent basis during the COVID-19 pandemic in the medical residency application process in Saudi Arabia. It was perceived as an adequate and promising tool to replace in-person interviews in the future. Applicants' satisfaction was mainly driven by good organization, cost-saving, and their ability to present themselves. Future studies to enhance this experience are warranted.

Indexed as

COVID-19Internship and ResidencyCross-Sectional StudiesFellowships and ScholarshipsHumansPandemicsPersonnel SelectionSARS-CoV-2Cost-savingCOVID-19E-interviewsMedical residencySatisfactionStressSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34461872
PMCPMC8405253
OpenAlexW3159440541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.