Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34461862›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Opportunities for prevention: a data-linkage study to inform a public health response to youth offending in the Northern Territory, Australia.

Vincent Yaofeng He, Bernard Leckning, Catia Malvaso, Tamika Williams, Leanne Liddle, Steven Guthridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincent Yaofeng HeMenzies School of Health Research, Building Red 9, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina campus, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina NT, Northern Territory, 0810, Australia. vincent.he@menzies.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7614-345X
Bernard LeckningMenzies School of Health Research, Building Red 9, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina campus, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina NT, Northern Territory, 0810, Australia.
Catia MalvasoUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Tamika WilliamsMenzies School of Health Research, Building Red 9, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina campus, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina NT, Northern Territory, 0810, Australia.
Leanne LiddleAboriginal Justice Unit, Department of the Attorney-General and Justice, Northern Territory Government, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Steven GuthridgeMenzies School of Health Research, Building Red 9, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina campus, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina NT, Northern Territory, 0810, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous studies have demonstrated a strong link between child maltreatment and subsequent youth offending, leading to calls for early intervention initiatives. However, there have been few whole-population studies into the dimensions of statutory child maltreatment responses that can inform these programs. The aim of this study was to investigate the sex-specific association between level and timing of child protection system (CPS) contact and youth offending.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used linked individual-level records from multiple agencies, for 10,438Aboriginal children born in the Northern Territory between 1999 and 2006. The outcome measure was the first alleged offence. Key explanatory variables were level (no contact through to out-of-home care) and timing (0-4 years, 5-9 years, or both) of CPS contact. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate cumulative incidence and a flexible parametric survival model to estimate hazard ratios (HR).

resultsChildren with no record of CPS contact before age 10 had the lowest cumulative incidence of first alleged offence by age 18 (boys: 23.4% [95%CI:21.0-26.1]; girls: 6.6% [95%CI:5.3-8.2]) and those with a record of out-of-home care the highest CI (boys: 45.5% [95%CI:37.0-54.9]; girls: 18.6% [95%CI:13.0-26.2]). The association of CPS contact with the relative risk of a first alleged offence was greatest for children aged 10-13 years and decreased with age. Timing of CPS contact was also associated with increasing cumulative incidence. The relative risk for first alleged offence was generally higher for children with CPS contact, of any type, during both developmental phases including notifications during both phases (boys, HR at age 11: 8.9 [95%CI:4.2-17.2]; girls, HR at age 11: 13.7 [95%CI:3.8-48.9]) and substantiations during both phases (boys, HR at age 11: 17.0 [95%CI:9.6-30.0]; girls, HR at age 11: 54.1 [95%CI:18.1-162]).

conclusionThe increased risk of offending associated with level and timing of early CPS contact highlights opportunities for a differentiated public health response to improve life trajectories for children and to reduce youth crime. Although children with unsubstantiated notifications of maltreatment do not meet the criteria for a statutory CPS response, the higher risk of offending among these children supports their inclusion in targeted preventive interventions.

Indexed as

Child AbusePublic HealthAdolescentChildChild Protective ServicesFemaleHumansMaleNorthern TerritoryRetrospective StudiesAboriginal childrenChild abuse and neglectChild maltreatmentChild protectionCrossover childrenData-linkageEarly developmental crime preventionYouth justiceYouth offending

Identifiers

PMID34461862
PMCPMC8404303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.