Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34461695›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2021

Refractive and Vision Status in Down Syndrome: A Comparative Study

Hassan Hashemi, Shiva Mehravaran, Soheila Asgari, Farzaneh Dehghanian Nasrabadi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Retinoscopes: Past and present.World journal of methodology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Ophthalmic Manifestations of Down Syndrome.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cognitive outcome measures for tracking Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome.International review of research in developmental disabilities · 2022
    Article
  9. Nystagmus in Down Syndrome - a Retrospective Notes Review.The British and Irish orthoptic journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hassan HashemiNoor Eye Hospital, Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran, IranORCID 0000-0002-2109-0856
Shiva MehravaranIran University of Medical Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Department of Optometry, Tehran, IranORCID 0000-0002-4249-3304
Soheila AsgariMorgan State University, Ascend Center for Biomedical Research, Baltimore, MD, USAORCID 0000-0002-7097-4033
Farzaneh Dehghanian NasrabadiNoor Eye Hospital, Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Tehran, IranORCID 0000-0001-9377-4248
Noor Eye Hospital · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRMorgan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of refractive errors and visual impairment in Down syndrome (DS) patients compared to normal controls. Materials and Methods: Cycloplegic refraction was tested in 213 DS patients and 184 normal age- and gender-matched controls using autorefraction followed by retinoscopy. Data from the worse eye of each case were used in the analyses. Results: In the DS and control groups, respectively, mean age was 17.2±4.8 and 17.2±4.4 years (p=0.993) and 53.0% and 49.5% were male (p=0.473). In the DS and control groups, respectively, mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -5.13±4.47 and -4.15±3.04 diopters (D) in myopics (p=0.050) and 2.47±1.64 and 2.36±2.04 D in hyperopics (p=0.482), mean cylinder error was -2.17±1.39 and -2.05±1.57 D (p=0.451), mean J0 was -0.03±0.89 and 0.12±0.76 D (p=0.086), and mean J45 was 0.11±1.02 and -0.13±1.03 D (p=0.024). The prevalence of oblique astigmatism was higher in the DS group (20.4% vs. 6.1%) while against-the-rule astigmatism was more prevalent in the control group (84.0% vs. 71.6%) (p<0.001). The prevalence of anisometropia was not significantly different between the groups (19.4% vs. 13.8%). Visual impairment was detected in 11.7% of the DS and 0.5% of the control group (p<0.001). The prevalence of amblyopia was 36.3% and 3.8% in the DS and control groups, respectively (p<0.001). Based on the multiple model, only absolute SE inversely correlated with age and differed between males and females (all p<0.05). Conclusion: In DS patients, the prevalence rates of refractive errors, amblyopia, and visual impairment are higher than those in non-DS individuals, and emmetropization appears to be either defective or slow. Cylinder error is stable in this age range, but the rotation of astigmatism axis is different from normal samples.

Indexed as

AnisometropiaAstigmatismDown SyndromeRefractive ErrorsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleRefraction, OcularYoung Adultamblyopiacomparative studyDown syndromeemmetropizationRefractive errorsvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID34461695
PMCPMC8411285
OpenAlexW3197544663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.