ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2021
Donor Cornea Use in Scleral Surface Reconstruction
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Etiology, surgical management, and outcomes of patients with scleral thinning.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Insidious ocular surface lesion in an 81-year-old woman.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the indications for and results of treating scleral surface problems with donor corneal grafts that are not used in keratoplasty surgery or are left over from keratoplasty. Materials and Methods: The records of 16 patients in whom corneal tissue was used to repair a scleral tissue defect or cover an exposed glaucoma drainage implant were evaluated retrospectively. Partial-thickness grafts were prepared using a combined microkeratome system with artificial anterior chamber in 10 eyes and by manual dissection in 3 eyes. Full-thickness grafts were used in 3 eyes. Results: There were 8 female and 8 male patients aged 5-79 years (mean: 39.37±24.68). Indications for the use of corneal tissue on the scleral surface were limbal dermoid excision (n=2), pterygium surgery (n=1), intraocular lens removal and scleral fixation intraocular lens (SFIOL) implantation (n=1), exposed SFIOL suture coverage (n=1), trauma (n=2), scleral tissue loss due to repeated glaucoma surgeries (n=5), and exposed glaucoma drainage implant (n=4). The patients were followed for 6-42 months (mean: 14.37±9.14). None of the patients had graft infection, thinning, immunological graft rejection, or vision loss during follow-up. Tectonic lamellar grafts did not adversely affect final visual acuity in any case. At final examination, a good combination of graft and recipient tissue, a smooth ocular surface, and a cosmetic appearance were achieved in all eyes. Conclusion: Donor corneas that are not suitable for corneal transplantation or left over from the cornea transplant can be used in patients with scleral tissue loss due to various pathologies and in the treatment of glaucoma drainage implant erosion. In these cases, the use of corneal grafts provides a good ocular surface restoration and cosmetic appearance. The effectiveness and safety of this method should be investigated with large patient series and long follow-up times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.