Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34461294›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry

Reproductive Decision-Making Capacity in Women With Psychiatric Illness: A Systematic Review.

Nina E Ross, Tinsley G Webster, Camille A Tastenhoye, Alisse K Hauspurg, Jill E Foust, Priya R Gopalan, Susan Hatters Friedman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Striking the Balance: Bipolar Disorder in the Perinatal Period.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nina E RossAssistant Professor of Psychiatry, University Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: Nina.ross@uhhospitals.org.
Tinsley G WebsterMedical Student, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, PA.
Camille A TastenhoyePsychiatry Resident, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Alisse K HauspurgAssistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Jill E FoustResearch & Instruction Librarian Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Priya R GopalanAssistant Professor of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Susan Hatters FriedmanDirector, Division of Forensic Psychiatry, UH Cleveland Medical Center, The Phillip J. Resnick Professor of Forensic Psychiatry, Professor of Reproductive Biology, Professor of Pediatrics, Adjunct Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

Funding

Building Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD043441 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI SADOVSKY, YOEL · 2002 to 2023
$10.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecision-making capacity can be affected by psychiatric illness. Women who have psychiatric illness who make decisions about their reproductive health may require evaluation of their decision-making capacity.

objectiveThis article aims to characterize existing literature about capacity evaluations in women with psychiatric illness making reproductive decisions.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review searching PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases through July 2020. Articles were evaluated for relevance to inclusion criteria, first by title and abstract screening then by reading the full text of articles. Our inclusion criteria were case reports and studies that involved women of childbearing age with psychiatric illness making obstetrical decisions for whom decision-making capacity was evaluated. We qualitatively analyzed our data by examining themes within the studies, such as the circumstances of the referral and characteristics of reproductive decision-making. We also collected information about the clinical circumstances, such as the clinical setting (e.g., inpatient or outpatient, in primarily psychiatric or obstetric care) and who made the determination of capacity.

resultsWe identified 18 articles, which included 22 distinct patient cases and 27 distinct obstetrical decisions. Decisions about termination of pregnancy were most common, which were 10 of 27 decisions. Decisions about timing and mode of delivery accounted for 7 and 5 decisions, respectively. The most common psychiatric diagnosis reported was schizophrenia, which was present in 8 patients. Major depression and bipolar disorder were also frequently reported, present in 3 and 5 patients, respectively.

conclusionPatients who make health care decisions must have decision-making capacity. A patient with psychiatric illness does not inherently lack capacity, and in fact, most patients with psychiatric illness have decision-making capacity. Psychiatric illness, however, can add complexity to obstetrical medical decision-making. Reasons for this complexity include the involvement of many stakeholders, the often time-sensitive nature of these decisions, and the potentially unpredictable course of psychiatric illness. Successful management of these cases involves multidisciplinary collaboration, the use of preventative ethics through advanced care planning, and identification of a guardian or surrogate decision-maker when a patient is determined to lack decision-making capacity or for a patient who has capacity through advanced care planning. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020143434.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderMental DisordersSchizophreniaDecision MakingFemaleHumansPregnancycapacityconsentdecision-makingpregnancyreproductive psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID34461294
PMCPMC8792197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.