Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34461136›Full record

ArticleContraception2021

COVID-19's impact on contraception experiences: Exacerbation of structural inequities in women's health.

Nadia Diamond-Smith, Rachel Logan, Cassondra Marshall, Chiara Corbetta-Rastelli, Sirena Gutierrez, Aliza Adler, Jennifer Kerns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Expanding access to postpartum contraception.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2024
    Review
  8. Fertility in a Pandemic: Evidence from California.Population and development review · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Is the COVID-19 Pandemic Continuing to Impact Sexual and Reproductive Health Services for Adolescents? Findings From a 2021 Survey of US Physicians.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadia Diamond-SmithUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: nadia.diamond-smith@ucsf.edu.
Rachel LoganThe Equity Experience LLC, Tampa, FL, United States.
Cassondra MarshallSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley and Adjunct Investigator, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Chiara Corbetta-RastelliUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Sirena GutierrezUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Aliza AdlerUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Jennifer KernsUniversity of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

Dev-Core-001P2CHD073964 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI JOSHUA R. GOLDSTEIN · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD073964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStructural inequities may impact the relationship between COVID-19 and access to contraception.

methodsIn July 2020 and January 2021, we used social media to survey 2 samples of women of reproductive age who had not been surgically sterilized and were not currently pregnant about their experiences seeking contraception. We explore whether experiences differed for people experiencing social and/or economic disadvantage due to COVID-19, using multivariable logistic regression to control for age, education and income.

resultsIn July 2020, 51.5% of respondents who sought contraception (total N = 3064) reported barriers to care compared to 55.3% in January 2021 (total N = 2276). A larger percent (14% in July 2020 and 22% in Jan 2021) reported not using their preferred method of contraception due to COVID-19. Individuals experiencing income loss (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.04 early in the COVID-19 pandemic and OR = 1.58, 1.21-2.06 mid COVID-19 pandemic) and hunger (OR = 1.73, 1.24-2.40 early and OR = 2.02, 1.55-2.64 mid-COVID-19 pandemic) were more likely to report they would be using a different method if not for COVID-19, compared to respondents without income loss or hunger.

conclusionsCOVID-19 has complicated access to contraception, especially for disadvantaged populations. IMPLICATIONS: Efforts are needed to ensure access to contraception despite the COVID-19 epidemic, especially for disadvantaged populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsContraceptionFemaleHumansPregnancySARS-CoV-2Women's HealthBarriersContraceptionCOVID-19EconomicsRace/ethnicity

Identifiers

PMID34461136
PMCPMC8570759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.