Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34460844›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Shrinkage in the Bayesian analysis of the GGE model: A case study with simulation.

Luciano Antonio de Oliveira, Carlos Pereira da Silva, Alessandra Querino da Silva, Cristian Tiago Erazo Mendes, Joel Jorge Nuvunga, Joel Augusto Muniz, Júlio Sílvio de Sousa Bueno Filho, Marcio Balestre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luciano Antonio de OliveiraFaculty of Exact Sciences and Technology (FACET), Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5054-2623
Carlos Pereira da SilvaDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alessandra Querino da SilvaFaculty of Exact Sciences and Technology (FACET), Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1702-0169
Cristian Tiago Erazo MendesDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Joel Jorge NuvungaDepartment of Agriculture, Chibuto College of Business and Entrepreneurship, Eduardo Mondlane University, Chibuto, Gaza, Mozambique.
Joel Augusto MunizDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Júlio Sílvio de Sousa Bueno FilhoDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3243-0959
Marcio BalestreDepartment of Statistics (DES), Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genotype main effects plus the genotype × environment interaction effects model has been widely used to analyze multi-environmental trials data, especially using a graphical biplot considering the first two principal components of the singular value decomposition of the interaction matrix. Many authors have noted the advantages of applying Bayesian inference in these classes of models to replace the frequentist approach. This results in parsimonious models, and eliminates parameters that would be present in a traditional analysis of bilinear components (frequentist form). This work aims to extend shrinkage methods to estimators of those parameters that composes the multiplicative part of the model, using the maximum entropy principle for prior justification. A Bayesian version (non-shrinkage prior, using conjugacy and large variance) was also used for comparison. The simulated data set had 20 genotypes evaluated across seven environments, in a complete randomized block design with three replications. Cross-validation procedures were conducted to assess the predictive ability of the model and information criteria were used for model selection. A better predictive capacity was found for the model with a shrinkage effect, especially for unorthogonal scenarios in which more genotypes were removed at random. In these cases, however, the best fitted models, as measured by information criteria, were the conjugate flat prior. In addition, the flexibility of the Bayesian method was found, in general, to attribute inference to the parameters of the models which related to the biplot representation. Maximum entropy prior was the more parsimonious, and estimates singular values with a greater contribution to the sum of squares of the genotype + genotype × environmental interaction. Hence, this method enabled the best discrimination of parameters responsible for the existing patterns and the best discarding of the noise than the model assuming non-informative priors for multiplicative parameters.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, GeneticBayes TheoremEntropyGene-Environment InteractionMarkov Chains

Identifiers

PMID34460844
PMCPMC8405011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.