Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34460814›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2021

The Easter Egg Weevil (Pachyrhynchus) genome reveals syntenic patterns in Coleoptera across 200 million years of evolution.

Matthew H Van Dam, Analyn Anzano Cabras, James B Henderson, Andrew J Rominger, Cynthia Pérez Estrada, Arina D Omer, Olga Dudchenko, Erez Lieberman Aiden, Athena W Lam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gene Expression During Scale Development in Pachyrhynchus Weevils.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2026
    Article
  4. Genomic signatures associated with the evolutionary loss of egg yolk in parasitoid wasps.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthew H Van DamEntomology Department, Institute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7473-9727
Analyn Anzano CabrasColeoptera Research Center, Institute for Biodiversity and Environment, University of Mindanao, Matina, Davao City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-0980-1651
James B HendersonCenter for Comparative Genomics, Institute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability, California Academy of Science, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Andrew J RomingerSchool of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America.
Cynthia Pérez EstradaThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4173-3756
Arina D OmerThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1336-2505
Olga DudchenkoThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9163-9544
Erez Lieberman AidenThe Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Athena W LamCenter for Comparative Genomics, Institute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability, California Academy of Science, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7782-6041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patterns of genomic architecture across insects remain largely undocumented or decoupled from a broader phylogenetic context. For instance, it is unknown whether translocation rates differ between insect orders. We address broad scale patterns of genome architecture across Insecta by examining synteny in a phylogenetic framework from open-source insect genomes. To accomplish this, we add a chromosome level genome to a crucial lineage, Coleoptera. Our assembly of the Pachyrhynchus sulphureomaculatus genome is the first chromosome scale genome for the hyperdiverse Phytophaga lineage and currently the largest insect genome assembled to this scale. The genome is significantly larger than those of other weevils, and this increase in size is caused by repetitive elements. Our results also indicate that, among beetles, there are instances of long-lasting (>200 Ma) localization of genes to a particular chromosome with few translocation events. While some chromosomes have a paucity of translocations, intra-chromosomal synteny was almost absent, with gene order thoroughly shuffled along a chromosome. This large amount of reshuffling within chromosomes with few inter-chromosomal events contrasts with patterns seen in mammals in which the chromosomes tend to exchange larger blocks of material more readily. To place our findings in an evolutionary context, we compared syntenic patterns across Insecta in a phylogenetic framework. For the first time, we find that synteny decays at an exponential rate relative to phylogenetic distance. Additionally, there are significant differences in decay rates between insect orders, this pattern was not driven by Lepidoptera alone which has a substantially different rate.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionChromosomesColeopteraEvolution, MolecularGenome, InsectGenomicsPhylogenySyntenyWeevils

Identifiers

PMID34460814
PMCPMC8432895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.