ArticleJournal of imaging2020
A Robust Tracking-by-Detection Algorithm Using Adaptive Accumulated Frame Differencing and Corner Features.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- UnCanny: Exploiting Reversed Edge Detection as a Basis for Object Tracking in Video.Journal of imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose a tracking-by-detection algorithm to track the movements of meeting participants from an overhead camera. An advantage of using overhead cameras is that all objects can typically be seen clearly, with little occlusion; however, detecting people from a wide-angle overhead view also poses challenges such as people's appearance significantly changing due to their position in the wide-angle image, and generally from a lack of strong image features. Our experimental datasets do not include empty meeting rooms, and this means that standard motion based detection techniques (e.g., background subtraction or consecutive frame differencing) struggle since there is no prior knowledge for a background model. Additionally, standard techniques may perform poorly when there is a wide range of movement behaviours (e.g. periods of no movement and periods of fast movement), as is often the case in meetings. Our algorithm uses a novel coarse-to-fine detection and tracking approach, combining motion detection using adaptive accumulated frame differencing (AAFD) with Shi-Tomasi corner detection. We present quantitative and qualitative evaluation which demonstrates the robustness of our method to track people in environments where object features are not clear and have similar colour to the background. We show that our approach achieves excellent performance in terms of the multiple object tracking accuracy (MOTA) metrics, and that it is particularly robust to initialisation differences when compared with baseline and state of the art trackers. Using the Online Tracking Benchmark (OTB) videos we also demonstrate that our tracker is very strong in the presence of background clutter, deformation and illumination variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.