Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34460700›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2021

Quantitative Comparison of Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Methods for Low-Dose and Sparse-Angle CT Applications.

Johannes Leuschner, Maximilian Schmidt, Poulami Somanya Ganguly, Vladyslav Andriiashen, Sophia Bethany Coban, Alexander Denker, Dominik Bauer, Amir Hadjifaradji, Kees Joost Batenburg, Peter Maass and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Data Reconstruction Using Smart Sensor Placement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Johannes LeuschnerCenter for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-9523
Maximilian SchmidtCenter for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8710-1389
Poulami Somanya GangulyCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-7194
Vladyslav AndriiashenCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2938-7558
Sophia Bethany CobanCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9935-5906
Alexander DenkerCenter for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7265-261X
Dominik BauerComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8781-2882
Amir HadjifaradjiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2222 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1063-4261
Kees Joost BatenburgCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3154-8576
Peter MaassCenter for Industrial Mathematics, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstr. 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-8345
Maureen van EijnattenCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9208-283X

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 05M20LBBDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK 2224/1European Commission 765604Holland High Tech PPP allowance for research and development in the HTSM topsectorKlaus Tschira Stiftung 00.010.2019Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 639.073.506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) images is an active area of research. Following the rise of deep learning methods, many data-driven models have been proposed in recent years. In this work, we present the results of a

Indexed as

computed tomography (CT)deep learningimage reconstructionlow-dosequantitative comparisonsparse-angle

Identifiers

PMID34460700
PMCPMC8321320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.