Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34460659›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2020

Investigating Optimal Time Step Intervals of Imaging for Data Quality through a Novel Fully-Automated Cell Tracking Approach.

Feng Wei Yang, Lea Tomášová, Zeno V Guttenberg, Ke Chen, Anotida Madzvamuse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Feng Wei YangDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Stag Hill, University Campus, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Lea TomášováIbidi GmbH Lochhammer Schlag 11, 82166 Gräfelfing, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0180-9445
Zeno V GuttenbergIbidi GmbH Lochhammer Schlag 11, 82166 Gräfelfing, Germany.
Ke ChenDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6093-6623
Anotida MadzvamuseSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Department of Mathematics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9511-8903

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/J016780/1; EP/K032208/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/R001588/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T00410X/1Horizon 2020 642866Leverhulme Trust RPG-2014-149Wolfson Foundation Royal Society Research Merit Awared
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-based fully-automated cell tracking is becoming increasingly important in cell biology, since it provides unrivalled capacity and efficiency for the analysis of large datasets. However, automatic cell tracking's lack of superior pattern recognition and error-handling capability compared to its human manual tracking counterpart inspired decades-long research. Enormous efforts have been made in developing advanced cell tracking packages and software algorithms. Typical research in this field focuses on dealing with existing data and finding a best solution. Here, we investigate a novel approach where the quality of data acquisition could help improve the accuracy of cell tracking algorithms and vice-versa. Generally speaking, when tracking cell movement, the more frequent the images are taken, the more accurate cells are tracked and, yet, issues such as damage to cells due to light intensity, overheating in equipment, as well as the size of the data prevent a constant data streaming. Hence, a trade-off between the frequency at which data images are collected and the accuracy of the cell tracking algorithms needs to be studied. In this paper, we look at the effects of different choices of the time step interval (i.e., the frequency of data acquisition) within the microscope to our existing cell tracking algorithms. We generate several experimental data sets where the true outcomes are known (i.e., the direction of cell migration) by either using an effective chemoattractant or employing no-chemoattractant. We specify a relatively short time step interval (i.e., 30 s) between pictures that are taken at the data generational stage, so that, later on, we may choose some portion of the images to produce datasets with different time step intervals, such as 1 min, 2 min, and so on. We evaluate the accuracy of our cell tracking algorithms to illustrate the effects of these different time step intervals. We establish that there exist certain relationships between the tracking accuracy and the time step interval associated with experimental microscope data acquisition. We perform fully-automatic adaptive cell tracking on multiple datasets, to identify optimal time step intervals for data acquisition, while at the same time demonstrating the performance of the computer cell tracking algorithms.

Indexed as

chemotaxisdirected cell migrationfully-automated cell trackingmicroscope data acquisitionoptimal time step intervalsparticle trackingphase-contrast microscopysegmentationtracking accuracy

Identifiers

PMID34460659
PMCPMC8321081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.