Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34460516›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2021

Transfer Learning in Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Juan Miguel Valverde, Vandad Imani, Ali Abdollahzadeh, Riccardo De Feo, Mithilesh Prakash, Robert Ciszek, Jussi Tohka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan Miguel ValverdeA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70150 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2708-1547
Vandad ImaniA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70150 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0198-3400
Ali AbdollahzadehA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70150 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6234-2012
Riccardo De FeoA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70150 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7510-1058
Mithilesh PrakashA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70150 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3853-4126
Robert CiszekA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70150 Kuopio, Finland.
Jussi TohkaA.I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, 70150 Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1048-5860

Funding

Academy of Finland 316258European Social Fund S21770H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 740264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Transfer learning refers to machine learning techniques that focus on acquiring knowledge from related tasks to improve generalization in the tasks of interest. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transfer learning is important for developing strategies that address the variation in MR images from different imaging protocols or scanners. Additionally, transfer learning is beneficial for reutilizing machine learning models that were trained to solve different (but related) tasks to the task of interest. The aim of this review is to identify research directions, gaps in knowledge, applications, and widely used strategies among the transfer learning approaches applied in MR brain imaging; (2) Methods: We performed a systematic literature search for articles that applied transfer learning to MR brain imaging tasks. We screened 433 studies for their relevance, and we categorized and extracted relevant information, including task type, application, availability of labels, and machine learning methods. Furthermore, we closely examined brain MRI-specific transfer learning approaches and other methods that tackled issues relevant to medical imaging, including privacy, unseen target domains, and unlabeled data; (3) Results: We found 129 articles that applied transfer learning to MR brain imaging tasks. The most frequent applications were dementia-related classification tasks and brain tumor segmentation. The majority of articles utilized transfer learning techniques based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Only a few approaches utilized clearly brain MRI-specific methodology, and considered privacy issues, unseen target domains, or unlabeled data. We proposed a new categorization to group specific, widely-used approaches such as pretraining and fine-tuning CNNs; (4) Discussion: There is increasing interest in transfer learning for brain MRI. Well-known public datasets have clearly contributed to the popularity of Alzheimer's diagnostics/prognostics and tumor segmentation as applications. Likewise, the availability of pretrained CNNs has promoted their utilization. Finally, the majority of the surveyed studies did not examine in detail the interpretation of their strategies after applying transfer learning, and did not compare their approach with other transfer learning approaches.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebrainconvolutional neural networksmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingsurveysystematic reviewtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID34460516
PMCPMC8321322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.